Sunday, October 1, 2006

Perfect Androgyny, London

Comments

Close comment

Detach comments

19 comments

  1. Anonymous

    October 1, 2006 at 10:35 am

    My vote? She’s a she.

  2. Miss Dish

    October 1, 2006 at 10:55 am

    I couldn’t carry this off but she looks supercool, effortlessly put together.

  3. krisrin

    October 1, 2006 at 11:53 am

    i don’t know if therd is sucha thing as perfect androgyny—- her figure is completly hidden —while she si fashionable, she look ssorta unnatrractive–like a big rectangle.. seeing how beautifula woman’s natural form is —i see no reason to completly drap eit in huge, monstrous fabrics— if she had cinched the waist in more, wore it with colors layered on top each other–alluding to shape, or thevolume was placed in a femnine way–thnk marni, marc jacobs, proenza… just my opinion…

  4. Butch

    October 1, 2006 at 12:45 pm

    This is absolutely winning…perhaps because of the gamine-exotic face….

  5. Carissa

    October 1, 2006 at 1:01 pm

    Lovely dishevelment.

  6. Anonymous

    October 1, 2006 at 1:11 pm

    Yes, very.. Nice pants

  7. Berlin- D

    October 1, 2006 at 1:34 pm

    wow, its really a rougher androgyny than the one you´d see on a runway or in a gallery

    Androgyny has always seemed dull, because of the impersonal facade with which it has been presented. But apparently, there is a third path!

  8. Berliner-D

    October 1, 2006 at 1:36 pm

    Oh, and the perfect accessory to boot.
    That stare really leaves no room for any trinkets or hats.

  9. Thebodytalk

    October 1, 2006 at 2:29 pm

    I don’t like this style. It’s kind of shapeless to me.

  10. The Sartorialist

    October 1, 2006 at 4:30 pm

    she is a he – like i said perfect androgyny

  11. Anonymous

    October 1, 2006 at 4:55 pm

    But of course he’s a he: look at his hands.

  12. Butch

    October 1, 2006 at 4:55 pm

    Un dude! All right!

  13. Miss Dish

    October 1, 2006 at 5:57 pm

    :o

    who woulda…

  14. Deanna

    October 1, 2006 at 6:53 pm

    Wow, I’m shocked that that’s a man… I wonder what he’d think to realise that’s shocking?

    Regardless of gender though, this just seems sort of sloppy and dishevelled to me.

  15. Thebodytalk

    October 1, 2006 at 9:10 pm

    What? That’s “HE”. Oh, no wonder I didn’t see women figure on him. Alright, then.

  16. Anonymous

    October 2, 2006 at 12:04 am

    I’m not sure if its a girl or a guy, but I’d hit it.

  17. concupiscence

    October 2, 2006 at 5:30 am

    Ah, and here’s another thing that seems to translate so well into your photos. A voice in the most desolate of places, the urban. Androgyny is right :) I don’t think I would’ve guessed…

  18. emil

    October 18, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    he is soooo beautiful <3

  19. sapphire

    November 11, 2011 at 5:55 pm

    how can some people think this is a woman? don’t you guys see HIS HANDS? those are NOT the hands of a woman, jesus lord.. some of you need glasses, or what LOL

    as a guy he could be pretty, but as a chick, indeed, no way, sorry dude, whoever you are

Leave a comment




Related posts