Sunday, October 1, 2006
Categories
Links
Blogroll
Subscribe
The Sartorialist RSSSubscribe to the content of this blog, in the rss feed reader of your choice.
Copyright © 2005 - 2013 The Sartorialist . All rights reserved. Do not use or reproduce without permission.
Anonymous
October 1, 2006 at 10:35 am
My vote? She’s a she.
Miss Dish
October 1, 2006 at 10:55 am
I couldn’t carry this off but she looks supercool, effortlessly put together.
krisrin
October 1, 2006 at 11:53 am
i don’t know if therd is sucha thing as perfect androgyny—- her figure is completly hidden —while she si fashionable, she look ssorta unnatrractive–like a big rectangle.. seeing how beautifula woman’s natural form is —i see no reason to completly drap eit in huge, monstrous fabrics— if she had cinched the waist in more, wore it with colors layered on top each other–alluding to shape, or thevolume was placed in a femnine way–thnk marni, marc jacobs, proenza… just my opinion…
Butch
October 1, 2006 at 12:45 pm
This is absolutely winning…perhaps because of the gamine-exotic face….
Carissa
October 1, 2006 at 1:01 pm
Lovely dishevelment.
Anonymous
October 1, 2006 at 1:11 pm
Yes, very.. Nice pants
Berlin- D
October 1, 2006 at 1:34 pm
wow, its really a rougher androgyny than the one you´d see on a runway or in a gallery
Androgyny has always seemed dull, because of the impersonal facade with which it has been presented. But apparently, there is a third path!
Berliner-D
October 1, 2006 at 1:36 pm
Oh, and the perfect accessory to boot.
That stare really leaves no room for any trinkets or hats.
Thebodytalk
October 1, 2006 at 2:29 pm
I don’t like this style. It’s kind of shapeless to me.
The Sartorialist
October 1, 2006 at 4:30 pm
she is a he – like i said perfect androgyny
Anonymous
October 1, 2006 at 4:55 pm
But of course he’s a he: look at his hands.
Butch
October 1, 2006 at 4:55 pm
Un dude! All right!
Miss Dish
October 1, 2006 at 5:57 pm
:o
who woulda…
Deanna
October 1, 2006 at 6:53 pm
Wow, I’m shocked that that’s a man… I wonder what he’d think to realise that’s shocking?
Regardless of gender though, this just seems sort of sloppy and dishevelled to me.
Thebodytalk
October 1, 2006 at 9:10 pm
What? That’s “HE”. Oh, no wonder I didn’t see women figure on him. Alright, then.
Anonymous
October 2, 2006 at 12:04 am
I’m not sure if its a girl or a guy, but I’d hit it.
concupiscence
October 2, 2006 at 5:30 am
Ah, and here’s another thing that seems to translate so well into your photos. A voice in the most desolate of places, the urban. Androgyny is right :) I don’t think I would’ve guessed…
emil
October 18, 2011 at 5:15 pm
he is soooo beautiful <3
sapphire
November 11, 2011 at 5:55 pm
how can some people think this is a woman? don’t you guys see HIS HANDS? those are NOT the hands of a woman, jesus lord.. some of you need glasses, or what LOL
as a guy he could be pretty, but as a chick, indeed, no way, sorry dude, whoever you are