Tuesday, May 2, 2006

On The Street…..Summer Dress #2, NYC

Comments

Close comment

Detach comments

35 comments

  1. weronika_zuzanna

    May 2, 2006 at 9:27 am

    i like her outfit a lot. it looks a bit like one of lindsay’s ensembles /white baggy dress and black leggings beneath/ but who cares… i find it quite simple and stylish. in an outfit like this you won’t end up looking like you’re trying too much

  2. Meredith

    May 2, 2006 at 9:32 am

    The leggings are so unnecessary! Not to mention unflattering when you can see the black waistline under the white dress. I REALLY like the dress, though. Perhaps she should wait until it’s warm enough to wear it by itself.

  3. abeautifulmess.

    May 2, 2006 at 9:36 am

    That’s a Chloe dress isnt it? Or is it BCBG?

  4. SportyChick

    May 2, 2006 at 9:58 am

    Wow, so it’s true, leggins are back after all. She looks great – but what’s your take on the bright white bra?

  5. argos

    May 2, 2006 at 10:15 am

    dynamo smile.

    If she didn’t have the leggings, we would see far too much of her. This look is were leggings are appropriately considered.

  6. MissPinkKate

    May 2, 2006 at 10:16 am

    Hmmm, I like the cut of the dress, the shoes, the bag, but the sheerness… I don’t really care for; it’s TMI, for sure. And the leggings! Oh, the leggings!

  7. fashmoda

    May 2, 2006 at 10:19 am

    Just one thing: She is beautiful.

  8. Anonymous

    May 2, 2006 at 10:38 am

    OK,
    Thats it!
    I’m moving to NYC! :-)
    Very beautiful woman,and a great smile!

  9. Gina

    May 2, 2006 at 11:38 am

    The dress is adorable, but I can’t get past the notion of black leggings under a white dress. Or any leggings under a dress for that matter.

  10. Rob

    May 2, 2006 at 12:45 pm

    Almost, but those leggings are bumming me out.

  11. Anonymous

    May 2, 2006 at 12:55 pm

    Leggings sure are popular this spring. Gorgeous girl though

  12. Anonymous

    May 2, 2006 at 12:57 pm

    She has such a charming smile that I don’t care if she is wearing leggings… I guess that is a good lession to all of us clothes horses, never leave the house without wearing our smile!

  13. Max

    May 2, 2006 at 1:14 pm

    A good look, but this would be so much nicer without the leggings.

  14. Irina

    May 2, 2006 at 1:32 pm

    i was going to buy that dress but i didn’t beacause it was see-through. this woman is smart

  15. Shopaholic D

    May 2, 2006 at 2:21 pm

    I kinda like the leggings…and Irina, you are totally right. After I read your comment, I looked at the dress, you can see her bra and the top part of her leggings! Still a cute outfit overall…wish I could pull this look off (though I’d prolly choose a diff dress)…

  16. Anonymous

    May 2, 2006 at 2:31 pm

    she is really pretty. that’s why i want to forgive her for the black leggins under the see-through nightgown.

  17. Anonymous

    May 2, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    I think being able to see her bra and the waistline of the leggings is part of the appeal? I’m not against see-thru clothing but it would have been cuter with a brightly colored slip or something.

  18. Cocktail Jen

    May 2, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    Sportychick–I’m so with you. I’m appalled at how many women make it all the way to adulthood without learning the rule that white shirt = nude bra.

  19. Fanny

    May 2, 2006 at 4:35 pm

    it’s an HM dress!! and every girl in sweden have bought it, it’s the great white springdress of 2006.

  20. Anonymous

    May 2, 2006 at 4:40 pm

    I own that dress and am considering returning it because of how sheer it is. I have worn it with jeans, I just can NOT get back into leggings. I am 31, it brings on memories of Debbie Gibson for me, not high fashion.

  21. Miss Janey

    May 2, 2006 at 5:32 pm

    No. sorry. She’s lovely but the bright white bra and leggings don’t do it for me. A slip is what’s called for.

  22. Peter Matthes

    May 2, 2006 at 6:29 pm

    HUBBA HUBBA!

    Meredith … I agree about the leggings.

    To be very honest I think the dress is unnecessary as well.

  23. Anonymous

    May 2, 2006 at 6:39 pm

    At first, I didn’t notice the bra and the see thru and do you know why?
    it’s beacuse of the LEGGINGS!!!
    She could have worn it over skinny jeans or something like that and a tank or something cool under the top of the dress.
    Leggings are just not the universal answer.

  24. jojo

    May 2, 2006 at 6:47 pm

    I like this outfit . I agree with 3.08 anonymous maybe a black tank or coloured t underneath to sooth the white braphobics? I do like the leggings as well.

    I think this woman walks the tightrope knife edge of style with aplomb.

  25. Anonymous

    May 2, 2006 at 9:54 pm

    kudos for the guts to wear the leggings… but i really think this is an occasion where a slip can be useful and sexy. the right slip or shift (cotton or linen?) would enhance the look without hvaing to wear the leggings.

  26. Anonymous

    May 3, 2006 at 1:48 am

    i agree abt the guts part…with it being the trend now to hate and detest leggings rather than wear them, i applaud anyone who still dares to put them on! and i think she looks lovely :)

  27. Anonymous

    May 3, 2006 at 2:07 am

    Not a big fan of the leggings… And H&M have sold a dress like that for two years(ever since princess Madeleine of Sweden was seen sporting one by Michael Kors) now..

  28. ngozi

    May 3, 2006 at 5:12 am

    oh boy…i ordered that dress. it doesn’t look see-through on the h&m website. will have to return it when i get it.

  29. noa

    May 3, 2006 at 9:07 am

    i have this dress from h&m, and mine came with a white slip to wear underneath! it was $29.

  30. KRiSTOPHER DUKES

    May 5, 2006 at 5:52 pm

    Ooh la love.

    She’s gorgeous, but all of these leggings are easing my missing New York.

  31. Anonymous

    May 6, 2006 at 12:24 am

    I like the dress, it’s really pretty- but the black leggings just ruin it, why couldn’t she have picked another colour? Or worn a slip underneath, which would actually have suited it more? This 80s revival is getting on my nerves.

  32. Sara

    May 11, 2006 at 5:27 pm

    This look is SO PERFECT because it does not look perfect. She has black leggings, white bra, and brown huaraches. She looks great without looking like she’s tried too hard. Who cares if you can see through it? We all know that she is wearing a bra and that leggings have a top to them!

  33. Anna

    May 31, 2006 at 9:08 am

  34. Anonymous

    February 1, 2009 at 6:40 pm

    Sara I agree with you. I don’t her look was supposed to be perfect. I believe she is wearing what she loves and feels good in. I love the look on her, and would wear it myself.

  35. aqra

    February 14, 2012 at 9:34 pm

    i really love this white dressssssssss :)

Leave a comment




Related posts