I agree. Don’t try this at home! Jacket is great. The pleated pants are not easy to pull off! I could never wear them. Wish we could see her shoes. And what type of bag has she got. I find that the “nerd” glasses are getting old quick. I’m already sick to death of them.
Really? My mother wore this is 1985. It wasn’t a good look then or now! I admire fashion forward thinking, but this is fashion in reverse in the worst way.
Cute! Love the jacket – fabric looks fabulous – with the striped shirt. What I can see of the bag I really like, too. The belt and glasses give the whole look fun and freshness. I am not a big fan of so many pleats, but the girl is adorable and carries this off well.
Please tell me why you would add to a tummy bulge with pleats and then showcase it with gold chains? I don’t think this is stylish at all, at least not in a good way.
I love this too! It’s so unusual, yet also strikes Diane Keaton and equestrian chords. Look at that belt! So well done! Love the glasses too and the natural face. Feminine makeup would have ruined it, no? The way her jacket and pants work together is genius! It’s preppy/academic elegance with a wink. Killer!
I have to say, for me, the haircut and glasses in combination with everything else just makes it look like the 1980s. I mean, I think somewhere there’s a picture of my mother in almost this exact outfit (sans chain belt.
Um, honey….NO!!!! Imagine everything being the same (love the big glasses!), but with some tight dark jeans….A ZILLION TIME BETTER. This is actually upsetting to look at.
She seems one yellow coat-of-arms patch away from 1983… The glasses, pleating, gold chain and cropped silhouette feel like a costume, not an inventive re-adaptation of 20 years ago. I can’t help but wonder why you chose to highlight her… did she have something that just didn’t translate in the still picture?
this is hideous. i hate pleats. her glasses are square (and not in a good way), though they seem to be in style in paris at the moment. she needs a new “do”. the bag does not go w. the outfit. belt doesn’t make sense. it does look like she tried, though, so give her A for effort.
She’s a little Diane Keaton in that it seems all so wrong…but I like deliberate and this is deliberate. Tremendous confidence is needed here to pull this off and she does!…I’m guessing, of course, but I bet she’s fascinating to know.
I don’t really like the pleated pants, but the coat and glasses are fabulous. The belt is sort of interesting, too. I really like the red pants in the background.
Oh please Please PLEASE don’t let those awful baggy pleated front pants that taper in the legs from the 80′s come back in style again!!! They remind me of MC Hammer or Vanilla Ice.
If the pants have flared legs, then I approve of the look…however, I can’t tell that from this picture.
Otherwise, from the waist up, she looks great! I love the jacket!
Loving it. But it is unfair not to be able to see the rest of the outfit. Think it depends greatly on the cut of the pants (which seem baggy) and the shoes she’d be wearing. But it looks good thus far.
I’m confused. Is this Paris 2008 or 1988? Is it a movie set? Because whoever did the costuming got it spot on! (Except the phone, I don’t think we had such tiny phones in the 80′s). ;)
It was such a relief to read the comments about this outfit. I was so apprehensive that everyone was going to swoon, as usual, and once again I would be off in the corner by myself shouting “No, you can’t be serious!” P.S. I think I had those pants when I was in high school , as well as the striped shirt and the glasses. Probably wore it all with an Etienne Aigner belt.
mmmm at least she doesnt look like everyone else and tries to imitate what she sees on other people. fashion does and don’ts next year pleats will be in and the next they wont so how bout stop criticizing someone for being and dressing how they want
Love it. This girls style has personality and imagination and it looks like she is doing it for herself. All the people hating on this are no doubt your usual overly preened fashion sheep. Shes got it. You haven’t…ha!
what an incredible blog you have here. the way you capture not just fashion but the heart, the personality of the person…it’s incredible. i fashion inspiration for decades now!
Bring on the pleats! I love that classical 1940s look. I never completely gave them up. To those who think they’re ugly, consider how great Dietrich looked, Katie Hepburn, and Grace Kelly. I am well-proportioned and not a plus size, so I’m going for it. If you refuse, that’s your choice. The advantage of these pants are comfort without lycra and the ability to wear any panties you want without VPL! Remember that VPL became an issue again when tight-fitting, flat-front low rise pants came back in style from the 1970s.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 7:48 am
Don’t try this at home!
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 8:25 am
nice colors, but I didn’t even care for that silhouette the first time around…
Karyn
April 1, 2008 at 8:43 am
LOVE this.
Diana
April 1, 2008 at 9:19 am
reminds me of Lisa Plenske in the german version of Ugly Betty (Verliebt in Berlin).
simonweston
April 1, 2008 at 10:03 am
Or, “How To Take A Page From The Diane Keaton Book of Style.”
amy c
April 1, 2008 at 10:06 am
I agree. Don’t try this at home! Jacket is great. The pleated pants are not easy to pull off! I could never wear them. Wish we could see her shoes. And what type of bag has she got. I find that the “nerd” glasses are getting old quick. I’m already sick to death of them.
Karmander
April 1, 2008 at 10:45 am
ah, darling. One of my favorites.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 10:54 am
Really? My mother wore this is 1985. It wasn’t a good look then or now! I admire fashion forward thinking, but this is fashion in reverse in the worst way.
kmccormi
April 1, 2008 at 10:59 am
I like geek-chic in single doses. EITHER the glasses OR the pleated “mom” pants OR the plaid jacket. But not all three at the same time.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 11:01 am
Pleated pants rarely look good on anyone. Cute jacket though.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 11:05 am
Cute! Love the jacket – fabric looks fabulous – with the striped shirt. What I can see of the bag I really like, too. The belt and glasses give the whole look fun and freshness. I am not a big fan of so many pleats, but the girl is adorable and carries this off well.
~ Miss Mary
ddafeng
April 1, 2008 at 11:15 am
Love her jacket and pants, and the little detail on the belt. Love the whole outfit!
ddafeng
April 1, 2008 at 11:16 am
Love her jacket and pants, and the little detail on the belt. Love the whole outfit!
Beth
April 1, 2008 at 11:19 am
cute girl, hideous pants–somehow the retro-trendy glasses play off the pants to make them look worse
Yaz
April 1, 2008 at 11:35 am
Love this look, the jacket really keeps it feminine
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 11:44 am
It’s all about the red pants on the monk to the right.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 11:45 am
Reminds me of how horrible front pleats can be on trousers…very unflattering!
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 12:27 pm
Please tell me why you would add to a tummy bulge with pleats and then showcase it with gold chains? I don’t think this is stylish at all, at least not in a good way.
night owl
April 1, 2008 at 12:39 pm
hello annie hall!
Carolina Lange
April 1, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Very nice jacket!
Milena
April 1, 2008 at 1:02 pm
I love the jacket, but these pants and chain/belt are awful
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 1:22 pm
I love this too! It’s so unusual, yet also strikes Diane Keaton and equestrian chords. Look at that belt! So well done! Love the glasses too and the natural face. Feminine makeup would have ruined it, no? The way her jacket and pants work together is genius! It’s preppy/academic elegance with a wink. Killer!
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 1:36 pm
Don’tknow about this one. She looks very frumpy.
Foodie415
April 1, 2008 at 1:40 pm
A 21st century Annie Hall! I like the look on her. Do you have a full length shot? I’d love to see the rest of the bag, pant length and shoes.
ouroboric adolescence
April 1, 2008 at 2:56 pm
is it wrong that i want to marry this woman?
jessica
April 1, 2008 at 3:10 pm
oh no!! i think its’ too literal, too annie hall…
too much glasses! too much belt! too much volume. i want the jacket to be more fitted, at least…
Gina Marie
April 1, 2008 at 3:10 pm
I have to say, for me, the haircut and glasses in combination with everything else just makes it look like the 1980s. I mean, I think somewhere there’s a picture of my mother in almost this exact outfit (sans chain belt.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 3:23 pm
Not only did I not look good in those pants in the 80s, I didn’t look good in those glasses, either.
Jerome O'Brien
April 1, 2008 at 3:44 pm
Um, honey….NO!!!! Imagine everything being the same (love the big glasses!), but with some tight dark jeans….A ZILLION TIME BETTER. This is actually upsetting to look at.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 3:44 pm
Hope the chain holds her pants up.
amyw
April 1, 2008 at 3:56 pm
EXACTLY like Annie Hall. I’d love to be one of those people who can pull off this type of look.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 3:58 pm
again another annie hall look, very similar to the irina post.
do you see this as a trend?
ama
April 1, 2008 at 4:06 pm
Nice colour palette. And pleats? Yes, as for me – I’ve always liked them.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Like the man tailoring, and the jacket, but I’ll never ever do baggy pants again, and this shows why very well. No one can look good in them.
La Terpette
April 1, 2008 at 4:29 pm
saw this in une fille comme moi, love the belt!
Charlotte
April 1, 2008 at 4:29 pm
please please, don’t facilitate the return of pleats.
lovely pattern on the jacket though.
sarah
April 1, 2008 at 4:40 pm
She seems one yellow coat-of-arms patch away from 1983… The glasses, pleating, gold chain and cropped silhouette feel like a costume, not an inventive re-adaptation of 20 years ago. I can’t help but wonder why you chose to highlight her… did she have something that just didn’t translate in the still picture?
Mary
April 1, 2008 at 4:50 pm
this is hideous.
i hate pleats.
her glasses are square (and not in a good way), though they seem to be in style in paris at the moment.
she needs a new “do”.
the bag does not go w. the outfit.
belt doesn’t make sense.
it does look like she tried, though, so give her A for effort.
when everything else is au fait.
April 1, 2008 at 5:19 pm
i love her spectacles.
Paul Pincus
April 1, 2008 at 5:45 pm
She’s a little Diane Keaton in that it seems all so wrong…but I like deliberate and this is deliberate. Tremendous confidence is needed here to pull this off and she does!…I’m guessing, of course, but I bet she’s fascinating to know.
Theo
April 1, 2008 at 5:53 pm
pleats, always wrong. excellent example of why.
cigalechanta
April 1, 2008 at 6:15 pm
I think I saw this photo on style.com? The cropped jacket makes it work. Like that belt!
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 6:19 pm
The line between love & hate is…
I just can’t wear something my grade 6 teacher wore. I just can’t. It’s too soon!
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 6:52 pm
Yes, yes! this is fantastic! I love the glasses, the blazer, trousers and belt. She is gorgeous! – i wish i could look that good.
phyllis
April 1, 2008 at 7:26 pm
Can anyone tell me who made her chain belt? I love it.
Heather
April 1, 2008 at 7:26 pm
I challenge most of us broads to pull this off without looking like we’re wearing Mom Khakis.
Margo Channing
April 1, 2008 at 7:35 pm
A little Annie Hall-esque, no? It works for her, but it’s not something I really LOVE.
I don’t care for those glasses… :/
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 8:16 pm
Very Annie Hall, don’t you think?
amy korngiebel
April 1, 2008 at 8:33 pm
i’m smitten. very annie hall. love love love.
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 9:07 pm
Nice….
wiiee
adil sg
Anonymous
April 1, 2008 at 9:21 pm
Frumpy! Also the Chanel-style braided-chain belt seems too formal for pleated khakis.
Amelia
April 1, 2008 at 10:55 pm
I don’t really like the pleated pants, but the coat and glasses are fabulous. The belt is sort of interesting, too. I really like the red pants in the background.
Anonymous
April 2, 2008 at 12:42 am
She is working it but generally not a flattering look from the front. It emphasizes pear shape especially if pants are tapered.
Anonymous
April 2, 2008 at 1:04 am
a woman after my own heart. love her.
Tina Frey Designs
April 2, 2008 at 1:48 am
Oh please Please PLEASE don’t let those awful baggy pleated front pants that taper in the legs from the 80′s come back in style again!!! They remind me of MC Hammer or Vanilla Ice.
If the pants have flared legs, then I approve of the look…however, I can’t tell that from this picture.
Otherwise, from the waist up, she looks great! I love the jacket!
Anonymous
April 2, 2008 at 2:51 am
Loving it. But it is unfair not to be able to see the rest of the outfit. Think it depends greatly on the cut of the pants (which seem baggy) and the shoes she’d be wearing. But it looks good thus far.
Energie
ks
April 2, 2008 at 3:56 am
some things are better left in the past where they belong. baggy pleated pants are one of them.
FireBrand
April 2, 2008 at 5:22 am
I’m not sure why, but I love this. Those glasses make it even better.
habitual
April 2, 2008 at 8:48 am
I’m confused. Is this Paris 2008 or 1988? Is it a movie set? Because whoever did the costuming got it spot on! (Except the phone, I don’t think we had such tiny phones in the 80′s). ;)
Anonymous
April 2, 2008 at 9:33 am
It was such a relief to read the comments about this outfit. I was so apprehensive that everyone was going to swoon, as usual, and once again I would be off in the corner by myself shouting “No, you can’t be serious!” P.S. I think I had those pants when I was in high school , as well as the striped shirt and the glasses. Probably wore it all with an Etienne Aigner belt.
SAM
April 2, 2008 at 11:24 am
I can almost live with the glasses, but the pants have to go. Nice jacket though.
Anonymous
April 2, 2008 at 12:19 pm
Nice jacket..but the rest is trying too hard. I find that taking a retro look too literally can become too costume-like
BenzW124
April 2, 2008 at 11:32 pm
This is exactly the silhouette/look that Louis Vuitton just pegged for the Fall 08/09 season…
Anonymous
April 3, 2008 at 4:13 am
Diane Keaton immediately springs to mind when I see this lady. Not sure about the trouser and belt combination but I like the jacket and specs.
Anonymous
April 3, 2008 at 5:20 am
here you ca see her shoes and bag:
http://www.garancedore.fr/category/streetstyle-photos/page/2/
Anonymous
April 3, 2008 at 10:53 am
She looks exactly Jan smithers. Actress on TeeVee’s WKRP in Cincinnati—seriously—google it!
playing fashion
April 3, 2008 at 4:00 pm
goood. new volume, new trend
jana
April 3, 2008 at 4:34 pm
not that i like the pants but the person seems interesting and funny
Weremonkey
April 4, 2008 at 8:00 am
Looks very 80′s to me.
And WOW! That looks like me in the photo – but it’s not me.
Anonymous
April 4, 2008 at 12:54 pm
As a fellow glasses wearer and due to the fact that she is at some fashion event – she could benefit from more makeup.
Also she needs to perk up her hair colour a bit.
The bag reminds me of the tennis bag Annie Hall used in the movie.
Anonymous
April 4, 2008 at 5:41 pm
mmmm at least she doesnt look like everyone else and tries to imitate what she sees on other people. fashion does and don’ts next year pleats will be in and the next they wont so how bout stop criticizing someone for being and dressing how they want
Lisa
April 6, 2008 at 8:53 am
Ugh. It didn’t look good in 1985 either.
Anonymous
April 7, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Love it. This girls style has personality and imagination and it looks like she is doing it for herself. All the people hating on this are no doubt your usual overly preened fashion sheep. Shes got it. You haven’t…ha!
Anonymous
April 8, 2008 at 12:07 pm
she looks like a girl morrissey.
leigh
April 9, 2008 at 2:11 pm
what an incredible blog you have here. the way you capture not just fashion but the heart, the personality of the person…it’s incredible. i fashion inspiration for decades now!
Anonymous
April 9, 2008 at 10:08 pm
I don´t know…. I like it, I don´t like it , I like it again…mmmmmm
:)
Anonymous
April 10, 2008 at 6:03 pm
Bring on the pleats! I love that classical 1940s look. I never completely gave them up. To those who think they’re ugly, consider how great Dietrich looked, Katie Hepburn, and Grace Kelly. I am well-proportioned and not a plus size, so I’m going for it. If you refuse, that’s your choice. The advantage of these pants are comfort without lycra and the ability to wear any panties you want without VPL! Remember that VPL became an issue again when tight-fitting, flat-front low rise pants came back in style from the 1970s.
pearlescent
April 13, 2008 at 7:55 pm
Love how the belt adds a lot to this outfit..
Anonymous
April 16, 2008 at 5:56 pm
She seems very refreshing to me – a non-snob.
Nidya R. Wiguno
October 12, 2008 at 5:46 am
i like her jacket :)
Gabriele Coughlin
August 16, 2011 at 2:58 pm
Ohh great post love it!
Jorge
July 12, 2012 at 3:04 pm
Wow, a lot of thumbs down.
O really liked this.