I agree completely. If she were an average-looking girl, she wouldn’t get a second look. Now if she had done something interesting to complement the full pants, that would be worth the post. (And yes, the clutch and shoes are darling, but wasted on an outfit that looks better suited to gardening.)
Good example of how close good style can be to no style. The subtle blues, the edge of the shirt, the cool shoes and pattern on the bag make it something nice to see, but with other shoes and no bag, it could just look like baggy, shapeless clothes. A small tweak or two on a pretty girl can turn nothing into something.
Colors, geometric shapes, textures, contrasts – everything in one photo! The clothes by themselves perhaps don’t appear to be anything special but there is poetry in your composition aligning her over-sized elongated pants parallel to the doors. Sometimes your posts are more about photography than fashion. Here, the background accentuates the girl’s long frame – a casual grace.
My question is often the same when I look at these images…would this be taken as a fashion faux pas if the woman was a size 10/12? I happen to adore the baggy pants, oversized look and wish i could replicate it, but I am a shorter woman and currently a size 10. Would I be called “dumpy” in this look, or many of the others I have seen here, or would I be able to get away with it if my face is pretty enough, or if I was young enough?
What a great pair of jeans. Shoes, too. I like her understated look-twice outfit, and how comfortable she is in it. For some reason reminds me of that old Rolling Stones tune, ‘The Singer Not the Song’.