Sunday, May 28, 2006
Notice no crease in the pants
Categories
Links
Blogroll
Subscribe
The Sartorialist RSSSubscribe to the content of this blog, in the rss feed reader of your choice.
Copyright © 2005 - 2013 The Sartorialist . All rights reserved. Do not use or reproduce without permission.
Gary
May 28, 2006 at 11:24 am
He looked totally dandy. Personally, I really like the shoes!
Anonymous
May 28, 2006 at 12:27 pm
The guy at the right is looking good, hard to se the fit of the jacket, but it looks good open.
And isn’t the guy att the left, the Italian man from earlier?
Anonymous
May 28, 2006 at 1:32 pm
I could not get beyond the matching tie, suits and shoes to see there there was no crease in the pants!
iopine
May 28, 2006 at 1:42 pm
I’d never have noticed that, as I was compelled by the shoe choice (brilliant!). Thanks for pointing it out. What a great look.
Anonymous
May 28, 2006 at 2:11 pm
And the ties. Brilliant.
Anonymous
May 28, 2006 at 4:22 pm
isn’t the gentleman on the left side the one you have already fotographed for “style cue part 2 ‘scusi’”?
Trenditional
May 28, 2006 at 4:47 pm
He’s with the old guy from the recent past postings.
I really like both of their shoes!
invisible girl
May 28, 2006 at 8:03 pm
Interesting to see the brown shoes with the dark pants.
Miss Dish
May 29, 2006 at 1:06 am
The suit / shoes combination is perfect. Is it just me or is the pairing of a navy suit and a Brittish tan oxford a coupling made in heaven? A black shoe always seems so harsh and a brown shoe seems a tad provincial. No?
fashmoda
May 29, 2006 at 3:18 am
I like the shoes! This is a lool you see very often here in Milan. Business look ‘alla italiana’.
Anonymous
May 29, 2006 at 8:41 pm
The tie….the shoes…
Swoon!
-AthenaNY
Anonymous
May 30, 2006 at 9:06 am
That’s Carlo, the travelling tailor from Saint Andrews suits. I’ve met him a few times in Sydney.
He is always impeccably dress.
Anonymous
May 30, 2006 at 10:57 am
dissent: to me, they look somewhat unkempt, and although shoe choices are good they are utterly uncared-for! plus the right man’s tie violates Sartorialist’s maxim that Italian = longer back piece; in fact his front is a little too long (the opposite of the usual mistake).