Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Men’s Vogue -2nd Issue – I Want To Love You

I just picked up the second issue of Men’s Vogue – I want so bad to love it but…..

Maybe I misunderstood the audience Men’s Vogue was going for but I got the impression that they were targeting the slightly older, sophisticated man that wants something a bit more refined than the current GQ selection, but still no less fashion relevant – GQ for the Borrelli, Bergdorf set. The first issue was great and raised the bar of excellence in men’s fashion magazines.

Maybe the first issue just set the bar a little too high.

In my experience, the men that are over 25 and still into fashion are really into fashion, and there is currently a giant void in the magazine market for that niche – perfect timing for Men’s Vogue – but this issue has very little real fashion coverage.

The main fashion editorial is a blandish suit story featuring Paul Bettany of the upcoming movie “The DaVinci Code”. I guess it is ok but it is just missing that pop of something really special or inspiring. The suits are all a taupy-tan-ish and paired with uninspiring tonal shirts and ties. Putting together exciting (but not necessarily over-dramatic) suit/shirt/pocket square/tie combinations is exactly the kind of direction men want from fashion magazines. The front of the book articles all look very interesting but it is the meat-and-potatoes fashion coverage that I want from Men’s Vogue, not more political critiques from a fashion magazine.

The styling of the Tiger Woods story is completely forgettable and the accessories coverage is all golf shoes and golf gloves.

Considering that it is much more difficult for men to dress really great in the high heat of summer, an issue like this could be a valuable tool. Color was all over the runways for Spring 2006 and is in the stores in a big way right now, how about a little direction from Men’s Vogue on how to make color work for men over 30 in both our work and causal wardrobes? There are two ties “of color” in the entire magazine.

By far the best fashion is a story called “Life Studies” that was shot on two “real people”: “literary power broker” Luke Janklow (shot in his own jacket) and “public intellectual” Noah Feldman. It just proves my point that real guys are so much more aspirational than what the runways and magazines are feeding us.

Men’s Vogue has access to all the best brands in the world, so why are so many of the same brands that are already featured in GQ, Esquire, and seemingly every other men’s magazine also in Men’s Vogue. Can’t anyone break the advertisers grip?

Dear Men’s Vogue,
We had an incredible first date but the second was a bit shaky; everyone knows I give it up on the third, so I’m crossing my fingers you bring the heat for the next issue.

Comments

Close comment

Detach comments

15 comments

  1. MrWynn

    February 28, 2006 at 6:58 pm

    Agreed, and I felt the same about Vitals. If the team over at Mens Vogue is looking for inspiration, head over to Kinokuniya and pick up nearly any Japanese men’s magazine. Prepare to be blown away and proceed to steal smart as one of my college professors used to say.

  2. Kim

    February 28, 2006 at 8:55 pm

    i actually liked vitals alot for what it was: a more upscale version of cargo.

    who’s on the cover of the mens vogue, btw?

  3. The Sartorialist

    February 28, 2006 at 10:00 pm

    Tiger Woods is on the cover -

    he is not exactly my idea of a Sartorialist

  4. Steven Swain

    March 1, 2006 at 12:05 am

    I’m a subscriber, but I haven’t seen my copy yet. Doesn’t sound promising.

  5. Anonymous

    March 1, 2006 at 1:10 am

    Every relationship is doomed to end in disappointment sooner or later. I figured MV would last longer than a one night stand.

  6. Mike Paget

    March 1, 2006 at 7:55 am

    I couldn’t agree more – Am I really supposed to be reading Maxim at the ripe age of 29?

  7. Anonymous

    March 1, 2006 at 8:45 am

    Didn’t even know Men’s Vogue was publishing a US edition (I must be a “trad”). I must get my mitts on the first edition (any ideas?). That the content is less than inspiring does not surprise me. I often have this problem with US fashion mags (yes, I am a Euro and biased). I just find them all so “safe” (and that goes for the adverts too). Their readership seems to have too much money and too little personality.

  8. Anonymous

    March 1, 2006 at 2:50 pm

    It’s more Vanity Fair than Vogue. And Tiger Woods on the cover is just inexcusable!
    signed the German journalist #2

  9. Swagger

    March 2, 2006 at 10:39 am

    After seeing this post last night, I ran to the local zine store and scooped up the second issue. I must say that it should have been titled “Men’s Void”. Void of the ideas, photos and stories that made me fall in love the first time around. I was so disappointed. Unlike most men’s mags when I buy them, I end up tearing out one or two pages that interest me and toss the rest. As a tribute to the first issue of MV, The entire issue has been in my bathroom for the last few months and I have returned and re-read the entire issue over and over, I was feeling like my long lost twin separated at birth had finally come home. I know hundreds of thousands of men like me have been clawing the walls for the next issue to come out and now I feel as though I have been gut shot. Someone needs to be fired! Please just use the first issue as a template to fill a literary void in my heart. As far as Woods being the central story, this where I run out of words……uggghhh

  10. Alex

    March 2, 2006 at 4:01 pm

    The magazine has no “identity”..it will develop in time…do they want to be GQ or L’Homme…

  11. Alex

    March 2, 2006 at 4:05 pm

    The first edition wasn’t very good either.

  12. Anonymous

    March 3, 2006 at 10:14 am

    Tiger Woods?!?! Who cares any more?

  13. Anonymous

    March 26, 2006 at 10:41 pm

    fyi-

    I know from a close, reliable soure, that noah feldman wore all of his own clothes but they gave him differnt shoes to wear during the shoot and then he didn’t get to keep them. this seems low level to me. they should’ve given him the shoes.

  14. jim jam

    February 10, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    I agree with all, such a shame.

    If it was the US vogue for Women (with more European influence, and fashion from the likes of L’uomo Vogue) for MEN, I’d be sold.

    Perhaps someone should send these comments there direct and give them all a bit of a kick up the bum they require!

  15. JĂ©rĂ´me

    March 1, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    2009: L`uomo vogue. All the years i have bought that magazine. They have had such a great layout, but since ( i try to remember) the end of 2007 (?) it is horrible. There is nothing which inspires me. It is like the GQ or FHM. Nothing spectacular. All the same and same stories: Naked wifes, cars, suits, yachts and “which cigar to smoke in which bar”. No, no, no, this is not me. I have stoped to buy it.

Leave a comment




Related posts