Jump to comment form
November 18, 2013 at 2:08 pm
Strange how much you can tell from just seeing this much of a person.
November 18, 2013 at 3:43 pm
You are so right.
November 18, 2013 at 4:43 pm
Kisses from http://www.withorwithoutshoes.com
Today I show you a Comfy look with a rock touch…wearing my new ankle boots for first time!
November 19, 2013 at 10:32 am
I love this site, and I come to look at the photos everyday, but one of the reasons I do so is to read the (sometimes) ignorant comments of the posters.
Not to offend anyone directly, but this photo could quite possibly be of a homeless man, a street person, or whatever term you wish to use.
It could also just as easily be an affluent hipster wearing a highly dysfunctional piece of high-fashion.
I think the ambiguity of that is very dangerous.
November 19, 2013 at 2:03 pm
I totally agree with the dangerous quality of the photo’s ambiguity. Not wanting to offend anybody, but maybe the point of this photo’s presence here is more about social statement, NOT a fashion statement.
December 3, 2013 at 3:53 pm
Most likely not, if you know some history of around here.
November 19, 2013 at 3:33 pm
I’m curious what makes the ambiguity “dangerous” to you. To me it’s more interesting than dangerous. Are you suggesting that this is somehow a trap for “ignorant” posters? Ambiguity or not, there’s always a danger in making assumptions.
November 19, 2013 at 8:32 pm
The ‘danger’ here is somehow thinking that this is in the territory of Zoolander’s “Derelicte” Collection. I don’t know if it’s a ‘trap’ … but when reading some of these comments, I’m thinking Brüno and Zoolander :-)
November 20, 2013 at 2:26 pm
I’m with you, Alison (you’re spot-on about the potential of this work being Zoolander, and SB Cohen territory).
What interests me is the “intent vs. the impact” of a photo like this one being posted on a public message board.
Scott seeks images of beauty, or rawness, or “aboriginals” in their natural habitats (street people suddenly has layers of meaning…is Scott photographing “street people” (men and women going about their daily lives) or he photographing “street people” (the indigent, the down and out, the homeless, etc.)?
And it opens the question about what beauty it, and what Scott’s goal is…
Is he Diane Arbus, Dorothea Lange, or Helmut Lang?
November 21, 2013 at 3:28 am
Can it just be a remarkable texture?
November 20, 2013 at 3:21 pm
It is obviously a homeless man. Look at the posture. At least that is how I perceived it. And I don’t think there is anything to diminish the ever growing problem of homelessness in this photo. Its is interesting texture, actually, and that worth noticing. But also it is a photo of something you see very, very often in any city, even small ones today. People with nowhere to live. The ambiguity is not dangerous. There is beauty in all sorts of things. The danger is not in fashion at all. the danger is in people doing nothing about the problem. I would argue that its better use of the indignation to donate some money or raise the question at a precinct meeting then to worry about hipsters. Its no secret that there are more, and MORE and MORE homeless people around all the time. Sorry for the rant. But its something I have been noticing too much of in the last five years or so. Its a lot worse out there.
November 22, 2013 at 12:16 pm
Thank you for putting it so bluntly :)
November 27, 2013 at 4:48 pm
Martine, your comment is by far the most authentic. I think the world needs more people pushing ground socially in fashion. As i perceive Scott has done in this image. The fabric may be inspiring but OBVIOUSLY this man is not attempting a high fashion statement. So that is why i do find this image in this context of ‘THE SATORIALIST’ offensive. Shame.
November 21, 2013 at 12:34 pm
People who find photographs dangerous need an intervention.
November 22, 2013 at 9:10 pm
people who don’t find art dangerous need an intervention.
November 19, 2013 at 4:35 pm
I’m not certain if it’s a trap for ignorant posters — but Scott is clearly trying to titillate the viewer by cropping the photo so that we can’t tell if the subject is homeless or just a tragic slave to “fashion.”
Perhaps Scott knows the truth — but, in the meantime, we have people wondering if it’s a “Balmain jacket” or if he’s heading to a soup kitchen.
I don’t think that’s the charge of this blogger (Scott). But I think the photo is presented in a way that will make people A) walk on eggshells about how they comment, and B) make people (yet again) pay homage to Scott’s eye for beauty.
I like Scott’s work. Often, I marvel at the comments his photos generate (the posters who see beauty and charm in the objectively hideous), but he has elevated photo-blogging to an art form. Just ask him where he sits during fashion week: hint…it’s in the front row.
November 20, 2013 at 12:07 am
I first visited this photograph early this morning. I mulled over some of the comments I read at that time – needing to find a way to respond to the discomfort I felt at some of the observations. Imagine my relief when I came back this evening to find this balanced response to the wide range of reactions. Thank you “wp” – you put my rambling thoughts in order.
November 19, 2013 at 3:01 am
I agree with you!
November 19, 2013 at 4:17 am
I’m curious, what is it you see from this view?
November 21, 2013 at 1:03 am
No not really. Like someone else said: is he homeless or is he wearing a weird piece of fashion?
November 22, 2013 at 7:15 pm
No. Just no.
November 18, 2013 at 2:10 pm
looks like a really old (not attractive) coat to me
November 18, 2013 at 2:32 pm
Would that we all had the personal and social ability to wear our clothes to this extent.
November 19, 2013 at 8:04 am
Wow! No words for this shoot O_O
Black & Olive
November 18, 2013 at 2:49 pm
November 18, 2013 at 2:50 pm
Mimics the stone wall on 27th St. photo just below.
I don’t like to photograph street people but I think this is an good example of keeping anonymity and showing character through the condition of the individuals clothing. Striking image. Very interesting
November 18, 2013 at 2:56 pm
I don’t often comment, but there’s something fascinating about this. Great shot.
November 18, 2013 at 3:02 pm
Wow- touching- how do you do that.
Experience the other end of the spectrum here- http://globalfashionfiend.com/2013/11/18/brand-feature-elie-saab-spring-2014/
November 18, 2013 at 3:16 pm
You definitely can tell a lot from a person by just seeing their back! The only thing is to not talk behind their back ;)
November 18, 2013 at 3:19 pm
November 18, 2013 at 3:24 pm
stunning photo. The textures and the light and the fabric.
I m sure is not a Balenciaga….but it snice
November 18, 2013 at 3:48 pm
This photo is amazing.
November 19, 2013 at 8:46 am
I agree, probably the most amazing photo ever.
November 19, 2013 at 9:59 pm
Life changing photo of someone’s back. Probably should be entirely the last word on photography. The medium is perfected.
November 21, 2013 at 8:05 pm
I agree Bill, I hope you are as moved by this photograph as I was. Perhaps this should have wider distribution. You are right, perfection in pixels.
November 18, 2013 at 4:14 pm
November 18, 2013 at 4:17 pm
November 18, 2013 at 4:25 pm
Hipster or Homeless ?
November 19, 2013 at 1:08 pm
November 18, 2013 at 4:30 pm
The best thing for the earth is for us all to wear our clothes this well. It is true beauty and the best example seen of of the style derelicte. I will look at this photo many many times.
November 23, 2013 at 12:09 pm
“Style derelicte”? Wow, shallow commentary. The man is clearly homeless and cannot afford otherwise.
November 18, 2013 at 4:39 pm
Good outlier from your usual shots ….
November 18, 2013 at 4:41 pm
November 18, 2013 at 4:46 pm
mi ricorda i Post-it!
November 18, 2013 at 4:48 pm
Totally worn to pieces and just like that it get’s a whole new look, beautiful!
November 18, 2013 at 5:02 pm
Crazy but inspiring
thanks for sharing this!!!
November 18, 2013 at 5:05 pm
I love the picture, the pattern is great, but the feeling is sadness.
This picture makes me really really sad…
November 18, 2013 at 5:09 pm
Hobo chic, lives a heroin chic life in a shabby chic apartment…
November 18, 2013 at 5:12 pm
Great photo! Very unique
November 18, 2013 at 5:14 pm
Great shot! I love the patina on his coat. I wonder why so many homeless people have such a great sense of style. I think there is a lesson here for all of us ‘rich’ people: you don’t need a lot of money to be fashionable! Just be yourself and have fun!
November 18, 2013 at 10:17 pm
He’s probably wearing the coat because it was the warmest or the only one he could find, not because it’s his personal “style.”
I’m guessing it was not a sartorial decision, and more of a moment of serendipity for the rest of us looking in.
November 19, 2013 at 8:54 am
Colleen, thank you for reading my mind … homeless people are not thinking of style at ALL … they’re thinking of getting through the fricking day.
It’s a sobering picture. There is something beautiful in this beaten up and worn coat and it made me stop and think. I also don’t presume this person to be homeless, either.
November 18, 2013 at 6:04 pm
I see on the back of this person a landscape of deconstructed art. I find the comments above interesting. The idea that this could be labelled as street person did not even occur to me, even in the context of a blog that for the most part is a platform for a type of fashion that is described by and idealized by the majority of viewers.
November 18, 2013 at 6:52 pm
Is this from Rick Owen’s Fall Collection?
November 19, 2013 at 7:22 am
I believe it’s from Mugatu’s Derelicte collection.
November 19, 2013 at 11:38 am
Thankfully at least one sane person out there!! Some of these commenters can derelicte my…..
November 19, 2013 at 2:24 pm
<3 that you caught that!
November 19, 2013 at 4:11 pm
Of course! I should have known.
November 18, 2013 at 7:03 pm
This shot is really cool. I studied it for a long time.
November 18, 2013 at 7:31 pm
November 18, 2013 at 7:34 pm
I want it!
November 18, 2013 at 7:49 pm
Maybe it’s his favorite coat. Maybe it’s his only coat.
I know I wear my favorite things until I can’t anymore.
November 18, 2013 at 8:05 pm
I love it when you surprise us and remind us that your eye is looking everywhere, without bias, for beauty.
November 19, 2013 at 3:58 pm
exactly what I thought.
November 18, 2013 at 9:52 pm
Interesting photo. I have no idea if it’s a homeless person or someone (like me) who won’t give up or repair a great coat. I’ve see dazzlingly joyous outfits on people who were clearly street/homeless/disadvantaged souls that could easily inspire an entire collection. Like the woman at 7th and The Bowery wearing a full sequined skirt, and a rainbow array of wraps, scarves and turban last summer. If only I’d had a camera–and the nerve to ask–so I could have photographed her.
November 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Makes me think of a tortoise or bug of some kind!
November 19, 2013 at 2:47 am
Ab fab!!! What a creative guy!
November 19, 2013 at 3:30 am
love the shot even though simple but speak louder than voice. In whatever form whether rich, poor or average, LIFE IS GOOD………….
November 19, 2013 at 6:01 am
Yes. This coat is like a piece of Arte Povera. I’m happy to see its had such a good life!
November 19, 2013 at 7:49 am
The New Art of Fashion
November 19, 2013 at 8:01 am
What a creative guy!
November 19, 2013 at 8:38 am
let’s just hope he can get something warmer soon…
November 19, 2013 at 8:51 am
Very thought provoking. Taking into account all of the chic very beautiful people that you have always shown us, this image could be anyone….it is interesting how many responses have decided who this is, or how this person lives. Great work Scott…you have an amazing POV!
November 19, 2013 at 9:34 am
Wow it reminds me the buddha’s cape made of pieces of material exactly like this. It could be one walking incognito in the streets… so much to do … so much to help !
November 19, 2013 at 1:49 pm
Really like your comment. We never really know.,.
November 19, 2013 at 9:53 am
People often go to great lengths/ costs to achieve this much wear.
November 19, 2013 at 9:56 am
Interesting post – comments; sort of a Rorschach test.
November 19, 2013 at 11:14 am
Frankly, my dear, he doesn’t give a “darn”!
November 19, 2013 at 11:43 am
I think this gentleman is homeless based on his posture, not just the condition of his coat. I’m not feeling a lot of energy from him, I’m afraid he doesn’t feel well. But this shot is a good example of what I love best about Scott’s really very compassionate camera work–we’re asked to take a good look at so many different people, without judgment, and just appreciate them. Just see their beauty.
November 20, 2013 at 1:04 am
love your comment!
November 19, 2013 at 11:56 am
This reminds me of when the Japanese designers of the 80s like Yohji Yamamoto and Rei Kawakubo drew inspiration from homeless people (and drew controversy)
November 19, 2013 at 11:58 am
I just saw something on the internet : “is The Sartorialist going too far by taking a picture of a homeless?”
I think the one going too far is the one who asked this question. People in the street get inspiration from the fashion shows, from magazines, from other people in the streets. Fashion gets inspiration exactly the same way, some designer got inspired by people who lived in the street and nobody thinks we need to make a fuss about it. Why Scott Schumann could take pictures of journalists and fashion lovers and everyone but couldn’t take the picture of a homeless man? You can see beauty everywhere, there is no “correct beauty” whatsoever, you don’t have to stay in a particular and closed field; there is no difference between showing the clothes of a good looking girl and showing the clothes of a homeless person. Well there is actually, but it’s not a scandalous difference. It’s all about beauty, aura, about showing everyone without discrimination.
November 20, 2013 at 10:46 am
That would be to ignore that on this, a style blog, there clearly is a “correct beauty”, just skim through the pages, so you really can’t have it both ways; there is editorial visually, editorial in the text and via the comments (which are approved for posting); an editorial which, by definition, is discriminatory.
Where is the face in this photograph and why is it not shown? All “auras” are seemingly not equal.
November 22, 2013 at 9:23 am
I agree on this, but I just meant that this picture is not at all scandalous; maybe the man did not want Scott to show his face, or maybe Scott did not want to. We’ll never know the circumstances in which the picture was taken; this is a step away from the editorial dimension of the blog, and even if of course when you skim through the pages you clearly feel the editorial, I don’t think it is hypocrite or fakely beautiful to post such a picture, it is just something different and people are talking about it, that’s the whole point.
November 19, 2013 at 1:31 pm
I love this image. I also love when you leave your images up without posting any follow ups, as if done on purpose to provoke thought.
And I think you should do it more often :)
November 19, 2013 at 1:43 pm
I’m horrified by some of the comments on this post. It’s undeniably an arresting image, but to stand back and call his jacket art or comment on the man’s “sense of style,” or even to assume he is homeless is embarrassingly insensitive and shallow. Comment on the photo all you like – the texture of the jacket is indeed interesting given the context of the city. But don’t comment on the man… we don’t know anything about him.
November 23, 2013 at 12:04 pm
I agree, James. Many shallow and insensitive comments here. Imagine having a chat with this man (obviously homeless, come on!) and asking him about his ‘artistic/beautiful’ coat. What a joke! I would hope no one would dare do such a thing. egads!
November 19, 2013 at 1:55 pm
Weird, simple yet faboulous image, great shot
Vin's Look Book
November 19, 2013 at 4:05 pm
This pic gives me an idea for a new design. Picture the same jacket but with colorful patches in place of the sections that are peeling off. Maybe even throw in some studs while you are at it.
November 19, 2013 at 5:24 pm
Location–Seventh Ave, aka Fashion Ave– provides context and commentary; otherwise, any other street would render the photo trivial.
November 19, 2013 at 8:29 pm
Beauty has no limitations!!! I love it!
This dear man is wearing an art piece
and has no idea.
Thanks for seeing & sharing Scott
Please keep up your brilliance!
November 20, 2013 at 2:21 am
It’s interesting, but not pretty. And if it’s designer, I’m certainly not paying for that!
November 20, 2013 at 9:29 am
How can you say that you can tell “so much” about people by just looking at their back when you really don´t know the guy and only assume to know?
November 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
Inspiring in every way! I think people should open their minds more…this is a trampoline for greater ideas. Thanks Scott.
November 20, 2013 at 11:08 am
I think the intention of this shot is that we can still find beauty in the decay !
November 20, 2013 at 11:24 am
i know u r taking a step in the direct of Diane Arbus…but this is the wrong formate
November 20, 2013 at 12:33 pm
Modern art. Beautiful.
November 20, 2013 at 6:16 pm
The stories that coat could tell!
“The Customizable Tuxedo Stripe Jean”
November 21, 2013 at 9:43 pm
Mesmerizing,beautiful,imperfect,vulnerable,raw. I keep coming back to it. Like a textile piece…
November 22, 2013 at 2:15 pm
Sart sees beauty/interest all over the place. This photo in & of itself doesn’t trouble me. But I sincerely hope that Sart asked the person’s permission before taking the photo and didn’t take the picture surreptitiously. Whoever was wearing this coat is a person and his/her wishes, dignity, and preferences should be respected.
November 22, 2013 at 5:42 pm
Looks a like a turtle with a problem shell.
November 22, 2013 at 6:39 pm
Just before I scrolled to this shot I was thinking…is it actually about the clothes? If so, why is everyone so attractive?
November 23, 2013 at 12:27 am
This is my ebay store inspired by rockNroll chique. Please check it out! (:
November 23, 2013 at 12:08 pm
I live in Phoenix where there seem to be more homeless people than I ever saw living in New York, possibly due to the warmer climate. It did occur to me this person may be homeless. That being said, I do not agree this photograph is sublime, or a statement piece. To me, saying that is just an example of “The Emperor Wears No Clothes”. My first impression is that Scott captured an interesting texture. Period. It is, indeed! But…it is also a very gross coat.
November 23, 2013 at 1:29 pm
This is really inspiring. You find beauty in something that isn’t typically beautiful. I like the subversion from high fashion to, well, reality.
November 23, 2013 at 2:34 pm
WOOOW LOVE IT!
November 24, 2013 at 2:52 pm
Its not a homeless man… :) but is excellent jacket! Wow! I repeat, excellent design!
November 25, 2013 at 12:08 am
Why have so many of the commenters on this photograph called this man “homeless”? What I see is a guy wearing a shabby coat that has an interesting texture. Why do so many of the people here assume that he has nowhere to live? I never knew that shabby clothing was the best indicator of someone’s living arrangements.
November 26, 2013 at 5:27 pm
I just saw him yesterday in Herald Square station. He is a homeless man wearing this patched puff jacket sleeping on the bench. But it’s really an amazing shot.
November 27, 2013 at 6:46 am
It is Ambiguous and it has us talking. I Vote for homeless person.
November 29, 2013 at 3:45 pm
It’s the most extraordinary photo I’ve ever seen here
November 30, 2013 at 11:03 am
How aesthetic is poverty in the eyes of the new rich.
This is pure indecency.
December 3, 2013 at 3:55 pm
Hipster or homeless? Doesn’t matter as long as my photos sell and I am hailed a hero.
December 4, 2013 at 2:44 am
This is surely a matter of common decency and respect? If permission was sought and granted for the photograph to be taken and used it doesn’t matter if the subject is a prince or a pauper.
December 26, 2013 at 2:18 pm
Love the picture
Too much judgement from the above politically correct liberal frauds … the picture’s great
December 27, 2013 at 3:34 am
when I look at this i dont think about the social asepcts immediately. maybe its the context of the site, or the lack of info that comes with picture, but to me this looks like a coat that was turned that way by time/use not intent. it could be a homeless man, it could be somebody who this is their fav coat and they wear it every day like a cartoon character. but most of all it awes me in the things that can occur naturally in texture/fabric through our environment instead of being created by a designer on purpose.
April 3, 2014 at 3:31 am
I saw this man two days ago on 54th and broadway.