Jump to comment form
May 2, 2006 at 9:27 am
i like her outfit a lot. it looks a bit like one of lindsay’s ensembles /white baggy dress and black leggings beneath/ but who cares… i find it quite simple and stylish. in an outfit like this you won’t end up looking like you’re trying too much
May 2, 2006 at 9:32 am
The leggings are so unnecessary! Not to mention unflattering when you can see the black waistline under the white dress. I REALLY like the dress, though. Perhaps she should wait until it’s warm enough to wear it by itself.
May 2, 2006 at 9:36 am
That’s a Chloe dress isnt it? Or is it BCBG?
May 2, 2006 at 9:58 am
Wow, so it’s true, leggins are back after all. She looks great – but what’s your take on the bright white bra?
May 2, 2006 at 10:15 am
If she didn’t have the leggings, we would see far too much of her. This look is were leggings are appropriately considered.
May 2, 2006 at 10:16 am
Hmmm, I like the cut of the dress, the shoes, the bag, but the sheerness… I don’t really care for; it’s TMI, for sure. And the leggings! Oh, the leggings!
May 2, 2006 at 10:19 am
Just one thing: She is beautiful.
May 2, 2006 at 10:38 am
OK,Thats it!I’m moving to NYC! :-)Very beautiful woman,and a great smile!
May 2, 2006 at 11:38 am
The dress is adorable, but I can’t get past the notion of black leggings under a white dress. Or any leggings under a dress for that matter.
May 2, 2006 at 12:45 pm
Almost, but those leggings are bumming me out.
May 2, 2006 at 12:55 pm
Leggings sure are popular this spring. Gorgeous girl though
May 2, 2006 at 12:57 pm
She has such a charming smile that I don’t care if she is wearing leggings… I guess that is a good lession to all of us clothes horses, never leave the house without wearing our smile!
May 2, 2006 at 1:14 pm
A good look, but this would be so much nicer without the leggings.
May 2, 2006 at 1:32 pm
i was going to buy that dress but i didn’t beacause it was see-through. this woman is smart
May 2, 2006 at 2:21 pm
I kinda like the leggings…and Irina, you are totally right. After I read your comment, I looked at the dress, you can see her bra and the top part of her leggings! Still a cute outfit overall…wish I could pull this look off (though I’d prolly choose a diff dress)…
May 2, 2006 at 2:31 pm
she is really pretty. that’s why i want to forgive her for the black leggins under the see-through nightgown.
May 2, 2006 at 3:08 pm
I think being able to see her bra and the waistline of the leggings is part of the appeal? I’m not against see-thru clothing but it would have been cuter with a brightly colored slip or something.
May 2, 2006 at 3:28 pm
Sportychick–I’m so with you. I’m appalled at how many women make it all the way to adulthood without learning the rule that white shirt = nude bra.
May 2, 2006 at 4:35 pm
it’s an HM dress!! and every girl in sweden have bought it, it’s the great white springdress of 2006.
May 2, 2006 at 4:40 pm
I own that dress and am considering returning it because of how sheer it is. I have worn it with jeans, I just can NOT get back into leggings. I am 31, it brings on memories of Debbie Gibson for me, not high fashion.
May 2, 2006 at 5:32 pm
No. sorry. She’s lovely but the bright white bra and leggings don’t do it for me. A slip is what’s called for.
May 2, 2006 at 6:29 pm
Meredith … I agree about the leggings.
To be very honest I think the dress is unnecessary as well.
May 2, 2006 at 6:39 pm
At first, I didn’t notice the bra and the see thru and do you know why?it’s beacuse of the LEGGINGS!!!She could have worn it over skinny jeans or something like that and a tank or something cool under the top of the dress.Leggings are just not the universal answer.
May 2, 2006 at 6:47 pm
I like this outfit . I agree with 3.08 anonymous maybe a black tank or coloured t underneath to sooth the white braphobics? I do like the leggings as well.
I think this woman walks the tightrope knife edge of style with aplomb.
May 2, 2006 at 9:54 pm
kudos for the guts to wear the leggings… but i really think this is an occasion where a slip can be useful and sexy. the right slip or shift (cotton or linen?) would enhance the look without hvaing to wear the leggings.
May 3, 2006 at 1:48 am
i agree abt the guts part…with it being the trend now to hate and detest leggings rather than wear them, i applaud anyone who still dares to put them on! and i think she looks lovely :)
May 3, 2006 at 2:07 am
Not a big fan of the leggings… And H&M have sold a dress like that for two years(ever since princess Madeleine of Sweden was seen sporting one by Michael Kors) now..
May 3, 2006 at 5:12 am
oh boy…i ordered that dress. it doesn’t look see-through on the h&m website. will have to return it when i get it.
May 3, 2006 at 9:07 am
i have this dress from h&m, and mine came with a white slip to wear underneath! it was $29.
May 5, 2006 at 5:52 pm
Ooh la love.
She’s gorgeous, but all of these leggings are easing my missing New York.
May 6, 2006 at 12:24 am
I like the dress, it’s really pretty- but the black leggings just ruin it, why couldn’t she have picked another colour? Or worn a slip underneath, which would actually have suited it more? This 80s revival is getting on my nerves.
May 11, 2006 at 5:27 pm
This look is SO PERFECT because it does not look perfect. She has black leggings, white bra, and brown huaraches. She looks great without looking like she’s tried too hard. Who cares if you can see through it? We all know that she is wearing a bra and that leggings have a top to them!
May 31, 2006 at 9:08 am
The dress can actually be found on the H&M website.http://shop.hm.com/media/products/400/DL400_52244_10100_04_0028.jpg
February 1, 2009 at 6:40 pm
Sara I agree with you. I don’t her look was supposed to be perfect. I believe she is wearing what she loves and feels good in. I love the look on her, and would wear it myself.
February 14, 2012 at 9:34 pm
i really love this white dressssssssss :)