Jump to comment form
June 15, 2006 at 5:53 pm
Great shoulder and sleave.
Love the glasses too.
June 15, 2006 at 6:14 pm
Pins ain’t bad, neither
June 15, 2006 at 7:36 pm
That’s Victoria Traina – Danielle Steel’s daughter, one of many. Another sister of hers is Vanessa Traina – a meilleure amie to Nicole Richie – who also has amazing style. They’re featured on thefashionspot.com and style.com
June 15, 2006 at 7:42 pm
What a great look! What I don’t understand is why a previous picture on this blog of a similarly dressed brunette didn’t look as “right” as this woman. Both women were beautiful and have the same (slim) build. Similar dresses. But totally different looks!?
June 15, 2006 at 8:01 pm
fab!!! the shoes are chloe i think.
June 15, 2006 at 9:13 pm
I.want.that.dress.(and the shoes..)
June 15, 2006 at 10:12 pm
The shoes are Christian Loubitain and sold out nearly EVERYWHERE.
June 15, 2006 at 10:18 pm
great outfit! love the shoes especially!
June 16, 2006 at 1:10 am
The glasses are great. The shoes are awful. And the dress – boring.
June 16, 2006 at 1:17 am
I love this look – I have a very similar dress but in black which I wear cinched in with a belt -might leave it loose nexttime!
June 16, 2006 at 1:22 am
she looks to be a very tiny girl, I think the shoes just overpower the outfit a bit. no?
but she looks great otherwise.
June 16, 2006 at 1:53 am
I love that dress!!!!!
June 16, 2006 at 2:43 am
those shoes look pretty darn chloe to me
June 16, 2006 at 3:37 am
I think the shoes ruin the look. Too heavy with that light dress.
June 16, 2006 at 3:44 am
The dress is just amazing.
June 16, 2006 at 4:10 am
The shoes look like Christian Louboutin’s Bruges, the one popularized by Nicole Richie and other young celebs, only they’re platform wedges.
She could’ve put on some jewelry with a simple (yet lovely) dress like that but the accessories – those fabulous shoes, bag, and aviators – make up for it.
June 16, 2006 at 7:13 am
Love the dress and shoes, but somehow when worn together, I think this look is too puffy/clunky for her petite frame. Perhaps her hair and glasses are better suited for a slick Gucci look rather than a soft Miu Miu. Her hair also makes her head look so much smaller than the outfit (i.e. the puffy sleeves look larger than it should). I would of liked to see a looser more natural hairstyle done up but not too tight on the head.
BTW, who cares, right? She’s beautiful!
June 16, 2006 at 9:06 am
Michael Kors’ pip-toe wedges looks much better. Those are good, but not with white dress.
June 16, 2006 at 11:13 am
Thanks for putting up a photo of a contemporarily dressed pettite woman!
June 16, 2006 at 11:20 am
I stopped at the shoes also at first, but then decided they gave visual (and actual!) weight to the lightness of the dress…like the base of a lamp to a sheer lampshade.My favorite part of the dress would be the exaggerated puffy sleeves.And she certainly has the body to wear anything she chooses.Great look!!
June 16, 2006 at 12:17 pm
They are the “Bruges.”
June 16, 2006 at 12:56 pm
The shoes ground the look. I like it.
June 17, 2006 at 9:46 pm
Very Chloe! Cute.
June 18, 2006 at 9:46 pm
i think thats victoria traina too, and i think her shoes are chloe. she looks fantastic.
June 19, 2006 at 4:46 am
Love that dress! Fancy Desire
June 22, 2006 at 3:28 am
the shoes are so ugly. they look like what short men in the 60s used to wear.
June 22, 2006 at 10:40 am
LOVE THOSE SHOES. They look like louboutin, or maybe chloe? anyone?