Jump to comment form
June 29, 2006 at 2:57 pm
the 3rd dress is gorgeous!!!!
May 8, 2016 at 6:17 pm
Isn’t it funny, hoe looking at this at a later date, the third outfit looks terrible. The first outfit is still relevant and elegant. The higher waist, the black and white are wonderful. The second outfit is OK if she is going to the beach, but not too great. The third outfit just looks very dated, and very unattractive. Funny how things change perspective in just a few years.
well, I got totally excited about the blue dress…that’s until I scrolled till the bottom of it :D It fits hers superbly at the top, but the length is just…weird :)
June 29, 2006 at 3:08 pm
I love that second blue mini-dress!
June 29, 2006 at 3:48 pm
I thought the first outfit was ugly and ill fitting not to mention the woman had very messy hair. The blue dress was pretty but what’s up with those shoes maybe some silver gladiators or even more sleek black would look better. And the bottom was fine but I think it washed her out a bit.
June 29, 2006 at 3:57 pm
That second dress is magnificent. The color is beautiful on your lovely subject. The style, the hand of the fabric, her pose!
Minus her accessories (bag, cigarette/pen?, flipflops) she’d be a perfect model for a classical Roman statue. Maybe she’s perfect, as is, for the post-modern interpretation.
And that dress would look great short or long. At this length there’s a certain athleticism for me…perhaps because it makes me think of the goddess Diana.
June 29, 2006 at 3:58 pm
Grecian!! This look should be pursued to the fullest!
June 29, 2006 at 4:19 pm
I don’t love the blue mini dress, it reminds me of the terry cloth shift I used to wear in first grade!
The third one though… the flesh tones with her dark hair is just fantastic. I could never wear something color, I would look like I was battling a serious illness.
June 29, 2006 at 4:35 pm
I find the woman in the first pic very interesting…I don´t like high wasted pants , but she is wearing hers in a way that looks cool and extremely elegant to me .
June 29, 2006 at 4:38 pm
a) Nob) NO — Unless she’s about to perform ballet.c) Gorgeous.
June 29, 2006 at 4:55 pm
The blue dress is a classic example of the difference between what women can find attractive and what men find attractive. I can see how women might love this look, but I can’t see any men thinking this look is hot. But who ever said you have to dress for men’s attention!?
November 30, 2012 at 4:08 pm
Seriously wrong. Its probably the one look that guys would find attractive. Especially with her great tan legs.
I am Hammie's Mommy
June 29, 2006 at 6:06 pm
i love the monochromatic look in the third picture. she’s gorgeous.
June 29, 2006 at 6:08 pm
the first woman i want to be friends with, she’s fantastic. the second i don’t care for at all, it reminds me of LA where i live and hate. last girl has an incredible dress that fits her fabulously.
June 29, 2006 at 9:42 pm
wow! i love everything on the third look – gorgeous dress! love the shoes!
June 29, 2006 at 10:04 pm
I know you are in italy, but why so many womens fashion in the posts lately?
June 29, 2006 at 11:03 pm
who is the little blue dress by?
June 29, 2006 at 11:26 pm
I can’t say I like any of these. I can see some merit in the last two but the first is simply puzzling.
June 30, 2006 at 1:43 am
looks like the 2nd girl forgot her pants (and a nice big sandwich)
Loving the 3rd outfit again – you’re always saving the best for last !
June 30, 2006 at 1:58 am
yeah second look is too la. la is a gross heathen place where style goes to die.
June 30, 2006 at 2:55 am
love the third dress! she looks like a goddess come to life. perfect!
June 30, 2006 at 8:38 am
first and last are awful, in my humble opinion.
But since the count was wondering whether any men could find the blue dress attractive, I’ll say — absolutely. Love it.
June 30, 2006 at 9:50 am
Hot, a triple threat of hotness and the Armani stuff on mens style – whew! totally smoking
June 30, 2006 at 11:00 am
Well, I don’t think I’ve ever felt as beautiful as I feel now after looking through your blog.
I love it.
June 30, 2006 at 1:35 pm
Wow.. flip flops really do something to #2. I dont know what does it.. but it has been something I have been trying to figure out.. yesterday in all the New York grayness it started to rain. I promptly went into the stores and bought flipflops so not to damage my Tods driving mocassins i’d been toting around…. and I didn’t really know what to make of it.. i wear flip flops inside the home all the time, but outdoors.. my feet felt so exposed.. I kind of liked not caring, but am a bit too paranoid with hygiene and decided it isn’t the best thing to do.
ARe you only going to show women on this post now Scott??!?!?! i’ve been keeping tabs on the other blog, but put some here … unless you’ve got some sort of contract that wont’ allow that. But keep it up. We are vicariously living through you.
July 1, 2006 at 9:55 am
Ugh, I am sorry, anonymous of 1:35 PM… flip-flops or any sandals worn in the rain, especially in the city, create such a disgusting feeling on your feet. One of my pet peeves. Unfortunately, it’s difficult to avoid unless you carry a spare pair of closed shoes with you everywhere.
July 1, 2006 at 5:06 pm
3rs is wonderful …. others are interesting in a halucinatory sort of way
July 2, 2006 at 2:22 pm
I love the pants in the first photo. The second is a little bit too la and standoffish, but I’d still call the look pretty, and the girl beautiful. And the third look? I’m not sure–I don’t really agree with everyone else. She seems too awkward for me even though the dress is brilliant.
July 3, 2006 at 2:07 pm
the blue dress is from zara! rosh x
September 13, 2006 at 2:01 pm
1. Not loving the high waist.2. Baby in makeup – not a good thing.3. Very elegant.
May 8, 2016 at 6:14 pm
Seeing it from a few years a later; the first outfit looks perfect. The second outfit is fine, the third one is very dated and mumsy.