Jump to comment form
October 5, 2006 at 3:01 am
October 5, 2006 at 3:22 am
October 5, 2006 at 3:25 am
you really captured that aloof chic from the painting in your photo
October 5, 2006 at 3:33 am
Lovely,quite wonderful. A slight pity about the way too oversized shades, but still, brilliant. This and all the other photos from the Dries show, Sart was clearly inspired!
October 5, 2006 at 7:40 am
Amazing resemblence! ooo…Such pretty pearls.
October 5, 2006 at 8:11 am
The resemblance is uncanny.
Personally, I think the use of the pearl necklace and the fur collar really highlighted and accentuated the length of the necks of the two women (I’m not trying to say that they look like giraffes.)
And sunglasses with hexagonal frames? Seems like the peace sign is missing somewhere, or else we’re back to the hippie 60′s.
October 5, 2006 at 8:17 am
Love this delicate, beautiful look! It manages to be both youthful and womanly.
October 5, 2006 at 8:18 am
Sart maybe we should call you “Art” this is one of the most gorgeous photographs I’ve ever seen, your eye is unbelieveable. You rock.
October 5, 2006 at 8:24 am
What a great comparison!Love your blog!
October 5, 2006 at 8:39 am
I may be biased because this is my favorite John Currin painting but…I love this. There’s a lot going on (the glasses, the necklace) but because of the muted tones it all works together.
October 5, 2006 at 9:31 am
The silk (or satin or….) banding on the sleeves and placket!
October 5, 2006 at 9:43 am
About the “Paris Is About….” woman at Style.Com: pefection.
October 5, 2006 at 10:04 am
Great photo and great style! I love the pearls – they look so right with the shirt and glasses. ANd yes, so wearable!
October 5, 2006 at 10:05 am
the painting is of his wife – the artist rachel feinstein
October 5, 2006 at 11:04 am
Wow that a wild resemblance! Did you take the shot because you recalled the painting or did it just happen?
October 5, 2006 at 11:33 am
Oh, your photograph is so beautiful, so much better than the Currin. It’s more like an old master, but with sunglasses. I think it’s your best photo yet.
October 5, 2006 at 11:46 am
that image is amazing…and it’s even more amazing that you made the connection between it and painting. when I looked at it, it seemed eerily familiar…and after the scroll-down, good grief!well played, Mister.
October 5, 2006 at 12:48 pm
those two are amazing
October 5, 2006 at 12:57 pm
I love pearl necklace. It makes her look sophisticated with some kind of casual shirt. I also like the shadow on her face.
October 5, 2006 at 1:04 pm
this is really awesome. and they both have a sense of secret luxury, the currin painting with the fur, and the girl with her awesome pearl necklace.good job.
October 5, 2006 at 1:22 pm
Yes, but yours is prettier.
October 5, 2006 at 1:43 pm
I thought I was sick of the big sunglasses trend but they suit her haughty expression perfectly. Love the big pearls, too.
October 5, 2006 at 1:54 pm
Your girl is prettier than the painting.
October 5, 2006 at 2:11 pm
Came to your blog by hitting the random next blog icon. Know nothing of fashion, men’s or women’s. Do know you take some great pictures. Enjoyed my visit.
October 5, 2006 at 3:33 pm
Love the colour of the pearls and the detail on her shirt. Really lovely.
October 5, 2006 at 3:57 pm
October 5, 2006 at 5:06 pm
I want to know when we are going to see ‘the satoralist’ the book. It would be great to have it layed out with some art work like the currin or vemeer’s intspersed that reflect a historical/artistic satroalist counterpart to some of your photos. Love it
October 5, 2006 at 6:10 pm
She is just picture-perfect!
October 5, 2006 at 6:26 pm
October 5, 2006 at 8:03 pm
really a beautiful photograph. it does have a wonderful diffused light like an old master painting. can we have a hi-res version?
October 5, 2006 at 8:10 pm
I am so sorry I don’t know anything about Mr. Curran’s work, but now, thanks to you, I will research it!
BTW I am loving the fact that your shot captures the exquisite soft details of her shirt and the sheen of the pearls is captivating.
October 5, 2006 at 9:48 pm
great blog, what else can i say…p.s. reading you on a daily basis.
October 5, 2006 at 10:21 pm
October 5, 2006 at 10:32 pm
OMG it does!!!!
October 5, 2006 at 11:24 pm
it;s a really cute outfit. oversize sunglasses are a new classic.
October 6, 2006 at 8:44 am
But that’s the problem with these oversize sunglasses: the wearers look the same, or the sunglasses minimize their individuality at the very least. I’ve seen packs of girls rendered identical by them. Not my favorite trend, surprise, surprise.
positively the same dame
October 6, 2006 at 9:40 am
cool. okay, now do “the scream.” can’t wait to see who you’ll use for the model, but i’ll bet you could find any number of candidates backstage at the shows ;-)
October 6, 2006 at 10:45 am
an individual look …no doubt…I would feel to photograph someone who looked like this….a very intersting quality about her ….
October 6, 2006 at 10:48 am
October 6, 2006 at 11:57 am
Such chic & seemingly effortless minimalism!
BTW…anybody hear about Yves St. Laurent? Is he ok? apparently he collapsed today.
October 6, 2006 at 12:58 pm
Wow, very similar. Great shot!
October 6, 2006 at 4:38 pm
I second the suggestion for a sartorialist book. I’d buy it.
*And as for the photo, I like commenter laia g’s take on it: ‘sense of secret luxury’ is such a great phrase to describe both the photo and the painting. Lovely.
October 7, 2006 at 10:32 am
Great shot and genius association. The same word came to my mind as previously posted when I saw these two…uncanny. I’m curious: what year was the Currin painting done? – JCH
October 8, 2006 at 3:23 pm
Jeez, that’s what I call beautiful!
October 13, 2006 at 3:05 pm
I had never liked the way I have seen pearls worn. Now I have! :-D
October 14, 2006 at 12:11 pm
She looks like an Original!
January 15, 2010 at 6:34 pm
i agree with cigalechanta that she is looking original.