Jump to comment form
November 15, 2006 at 9:50 am
She looks so cute (and happy)! It is such a big mix and she looks great – especially love that bag.
November 15, 2006 at 10:53 am
The cute owl sweater makes the outfit. It reflects her personality.
Just an Observation
November 15, 2006 at 11:11 am
I am crazy about looks like this as they very cleary state a person’s confidence and let one take ownership of the look, epecially here where is wearing a mix of clothes and accessories.VERY VERY COOL INDEED.
November 15, 2006 at 11:26 am
November 15, 2006 at 11:29 am
Hmm, I sort of like it too…although it is a bit WW2 British ‘Land girls’ if you know what I mean.
November 15, 2006 at 11:40 am
very kirstin dunst!
November 15, 2006 at 12:42 pm
November 15, 2006 at 12:52 pm
Oh, her jacket is sharp! The lines are really crisp and I love that. I really like her boots as well!
Did you by any chance ask her where they were from?
November 15, 2006 at 1:22 pm
This look says 1930′s factory worker + crunchy granola girl. Intersting
November 15, 2006 at 1:24 pm
On second thought: 1930′s factory worker meets 1990′s office worker
November 15, 2006 at 2:19 pm
She looks lovely and happy, and stylish. But am I the only one who sees this and thinks, “Oh, a super-chic married Orthodox Jew?” It’s not just the scarf covering her hair–she also appears to be brown-bagging it, which may mean she’s eating Kosher food. I could be wrong, but I’d be so happy to be right.
November 15, 2006 at 3:42 pm
Yea, I dig that.
November 15, 2006 at 3:45 pm
I love her boots and scarve. She looks like a Russian peasant who got a job in NYK! Really cosmopolitan!
November 15, 2006 at 5:00 pm
it is a great mix…loving the black boots.
November 15, 2006 at 5:43 pm
i love women that don’t pose, if you are a model at work, fine, outside of that, you look like an idiot with your “aren’t i important” attitude. this lovely is fabulous.
November 15, 2006 at 6:13 pm
commenters always seem to jump on the most obvious association… e.g. peasant or land girl (in this case).or a SLIGHTLY high waist equals the 1930s, even thought the rest of the look may be COMPLETELY different. really i wish some people had a broader frame of reference.
November 15, 2006 at 8:53 pm
This is such a great outfit…casual and cute.
November 16, 2006 at 10:27 am
What are the broader references I am missing, herringbonekid? I am genuinely interested in your opinion. I thought the head scarf, jumper + jacket, and heavy boots sort of screamed ‘working the land’, but what else is in the photo that is completely different from that frame of reference? The bag? Anyone else have any ideas?
November 16, 2006 at 2:46 pm
Love it all except her scarf – I call that the “potato gathering” head look…LOLHer smile is amazing!
November 17, 2006 at 7:41 pm
i have seen her around, she is french and has the cutest son ever!
November 23, 2006 at 8:38 am
i have been through all your photos and this is my favourite shot and look…
November 27, 2006 at 1:29 pm
em lo.. I think the shoes are from sixtyseven..
December 7, 2006 at 1:07 pm
love her, she is elegant, that is exactly the opposite of glamorous!
August 2, 2011 at 6:38 am
some women must be very care about scarves in their heads, ´couse scarves, some times, gives a look of paysans, or maids going work in their uniformes of working people,
if you choose a ssarve to put in your head, make sure, your with the righy clothes, stylish clothes, elegants…otherwise..