Jump to comment form
January 22, 2007 at 11:23 am
The only thing I can think of is in the New York Times there were some pictures from Milan. But I don’t see leggings mentioned anywhere. There was one guy in a knitsy/ski looking outfit.
Overall that writer pointed out that the tailoring was great and the collections shown pretty good.
January 22, 2007 at 11:25 am
Hi-larious. I believe he/they are referring to Godfrey Deeny’s FWD review of the Marni show, which also posted on Yahoo (http://news.yahoo.com/s/fwd/20070117/en_fashion_fwd/marnileggingsarethenewmusthave), as Fashion Wire Daily also got similar hate mail. Geez. Don’t hate the playa, hate the gams! (Sorry, I couldn’t resist.)
January 22, 2007 at 11:31 am
E-mail and the internet are amazing creations. Yet , it provides cover for psychos who have nothing better to do than send their fear through usually poorly spelled rants. Who cares if men wear leggings? Sart, sorry your day was littered with their spam.
January 22, 2007 at 11:33 am
I saw a photo from a runway show with an article “Legggings for Men”, but didn’t read it on DrudgeReport 1/21/07. Don’t know who wrote it either. Sorry.
January 22, 2007 at 11:36 am
Men in tights… F’ Yeah!I wrote an entry in my blog, like 1 year ago with this title.
Maybe this one due to time proximity is the article about the Marni show where leggings where the staple.
January 22, 2007 at 11:37 am
I’ve just googled “men wearing leggings” and found this article published yesterday by no other than … Godfrey Deeny! .Have a look:
Marni: Leggings Are the New Must-Have
January 22, 2007 at 11:38 am
what kind of “leggings” are they talking about?-spats?-gaiters??-legwarmers???
why shouldn’t a guy wear one of the above?
just because it would make him look like -gladstone gander?-a bavarian gamekeeper?-olivia newton-john?LOL
curious to see how the story unfolds ….
January 22, 2007 at 11:42 am
LMAO@don’t hate the player hate the Gams. Good stuff.
January 22, 2007 at 11:49 am
The Drudge Report had a photo/link of men in leggings – I’d imagine it’s some knee-jerk reactionaries who read it over there.
January 22, 2007 at 11:58 am
I don’t know why people are even surprised that leggings are becoming popular for men when you can’t even walk around soho, or WILLIAMSBURG without seeing men where tight-tight jeans that look like leggings already. Heidi Slimane built an empire out of it.
I’m sorry you ran into a group of idiots who can’t seem to respect another’s opinion (even if it wasn’t your own). Keep up the good work though.
January 22, 2007 at 12:08 pm
It is sad that the idea of something even remotely challenging can cause so much anger.
Apparently, your e-stalkers are not familiar with the “show” aspect of fashion.
January 22, 2007 at 12:13 pm
Well, hate mail and the cop incident in Antwerp: this was not you lucky day Scott! Anyway think about it this way: you were lucky not to wear leggings in Antwerp!
January 22, 2007 at 12:23 pm
Oh-those guys would have hated the ’80′s. Didn’t David Lee Roth and all the guys from RATT wear leggings, scarves on their hips and eyeliner?
January 22, 2007 at 12:28 pm
Cameo, Milli Vanilli, etc. Really, though, don’t pay these kind of folks any more attention.
January 22, 2007 at 12:59 pm
Wow, you’ve had a couple of hilariously odd encounters!
January 22, 2007 at 1:12 pm
I love that a fadtastic new trend evokes such reaction from people… this is what fashion is all about: challenge the norms with your own innovative intervention. So, kudos to those who love the male leggings, and kudos to those who hate them.
January 22, 2007 at 1:16 pm
homophobia is an annoyingly chronic this in the states especially (i think). myself, i don’t care much for the men in tights look. i do, however, enjoy it when men feel free enough to emphasize their shape – as women do and do and do too much
January 22, 2007 at 1:17 pm
People hating on style are unstylish. They’re terribly insecure about it and need to vent in some way.
January 22, 2007 at 1:25 pm
hahah wow let me just say that is so funny…thanks for the laugh
January 22, 2007 at 1:27 pm
I saw a blurb about men wearing “yoga tights” since more men are doing yoga..perhaps that’s what they meant..in any case..it’s ridiculous.
January 22, 2007 at 1:52 pm
Hmmm. Threatened over a post of men in leggings. Becareful if you run a series of men in skirts (not drag).
January 22, 2007 at 1:53 pm
Hitler called your country and mine his enemies, but I think we both can take that as a compliment. Same deal for you with those hate-mailers; an insult from them is really a compliment!
(But yeah, it can ruin your day nevertheless.)
Keep up the good work.
January 22, 2007 at 1:55 pm
clearly, the author of those emails was the cop in antwerp.
January 22, 2007 at 2:00 pm
The post that questioned male leggings and linked to your blog is from law professor Ann Althouse. Now I feel like the only law blogger who cares about fashion.
January 22, 2007 at 2:09 pm
I’m old school and amongst those who think leggings-for-men would look indescribably absurd. Yet, I’m not about to send a hate email to someone who happens to disagree.
January 22, 2007 at 2:14 pm
I agree its ridiculous to send mail about leggings, but really, sart, that was a bit much of a rant.
John R. Carman
January 22, 2007 at 2:23 pm
As a native New Yorker living and working in Pittsburgh, I couldn’t agree more with your choice of city for this theoretical experiment.
Seriously. I’ll get you a cameraman. :)
Amy in Pittsburgh
January 22, 2007 at 2:36 pm
Awww… poor Pittsburgh. I live here- and I can assure you that fashion is so unheard of that no one would care if you showed up in leggings- they would probably assume they were tight sweatpants- a perfectly acceptable local fashion statement. But, you’re always welcome here. I’d be glad to show you around what we do have- which is a city with a small town attitude, beautiful riverside parks, a better-than-decent arts scene for a city of this size, and a phenomenal view from Mt. Washington. Oh, and the people here are pretty friendly, if I do say so myself. And we can laugh at ourselves… thanks for the smile.
January 22, 2007 at 2:50 pm
There is a list of ‘leggings for men’ articles at BuzzFeed:
January 22, 2007 at 2:59 pm
why philly or pittsburgh?
January 22, 2007 at 3:03 pm
I agree with anon 12:28, just ignore them.
I admit, though, that I am bit ticked that they made you feel bad. They are a bunch of jerks! :(
January 22, 2007 at 3:19 pm
Sart – why are you so down on Philly? We’ve got style, too, you know…
January 22, 2007 at 3:38 pm
I suspected that fashion would come around to this again; I for one would love to see men in tight pants (maybe not so much in spandex). Do you know how much I drool over those Regency men in breeches?
January 22, 2007 at 3:59 pm
Fashion Addict Diary just posted about Marni debuting men’s leggings; it may be related somehow.
Random Fashion Coolness
January 22, 2007 at 4:25 pm
Don’t know what article they are on about but I’m sure they have mistaken your blog for someone else’s maybe one that would publish pictures likethis one
January 22, 2007 at 4:41 pm
Why the Philly dig? Your recent posts are seeming a tad provincial in a NY-centric way.
January 22, 2007 at 4:43 pm
Definitely the Yahoo article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/fwd/20070117/en_fashion_fwd/marnileggingsarethenewmusthave_1
A link to it appeared on the “featured” section of the Yahoo main page with the words “Men in Leggings?!” just yesterday (or was it the day before?). How you got associated with the article, I have no idea, but sorry! The photo from the Marni show is still on Yahoo’s ‘most emailed photos’ top ten – so clearly it has created a bit of a stir.
January 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm
To answer my own quandary: The reason you were associated with the Godfrey Deeny article that appeared on Yahoo is because when one Googles “Godfrey Deeny”, the first two pages to appear are yours, with the tag lines: “Godfrey Deeny, Fashion Journalist, Sartorialist”, and “Godfrey Deeny, Rogueish Style”
I’m thinking this is both good and bad news: Bad news because flame-writing morons can’t read and go for the first thing to pop up, good news because your pictures are, overall, more linked-to in the world than even the man’s own work. Yet another confirmation of your popularity. . .
January 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm
I remember one image you took in London of this boy in leggings and a coat. “A very London look” as I rememeber it. There was much discussion of that shot. Perhaps that’s what they meant?
January 22, 2007 at 5:23 pm
1. They’re mistaking you with someone else.2. Since your blog is a hot thing in the fashion scene, they probably think you’ve said something about men wearing leggings.
January 22, 2007 at 5:42 pm
positive_negative:Hedi Slimane, not Heidi Slimane. It made me laugh though, so thanks. :D
January 22, 2007 at 6:11 pm
truly a sad reflection of our culture at large and the maddeningly restrictive attitudes of men’s fashion how such an idea can cause such vitriol.
the persons who wrote you obviously know squat about the history of fashion. particularly prior to dandyism and the great masculine renunciation.
January 22, 2007 at 6:46 pm
How did you get blamed for the horrifying leggings article???
My brother in law saw that article and right away he jumped up, and said “Now I can finally wear my codpieces out in public!” everyone chuckled. Brother in law loves this site btw and is a snazzy dresser. no tights in his household.
January 22, 2007 at 7:27 pm
don’t really pay attention to this airheads! they just want your attention!
January 22, 2007 at 7:33 pm
Yes it was Cameo’s look, but it was pulled off with the padded jock strap =)
January 22, 2007 at 7:50 pm
why would you need to have this experiment be in philadelphia or pittsburgh, i wonder?
January 22, 2007 at 8:05 pm
I read Miami Herald humor columnist Dave Barry’s BLOG, where he made reference to an article on the men’s leggings in Milan on Jan. 22. Here is the link:
(Hope I did that right)
I enjoy Dave Barry’s humor AND The Sartorialist. I guess some people find that too much of a stretch. :)
January 22, 2007 at 8:31 pm
I’ll follow you with the camera!Let’s document this!
January 22, 2007 at 8:40 pm
this could well be ithttp://www.fashionwiredaily.com/first_word/fashion/article.weml?id=866
January 22, 2007 at 9:07 pm
Are Philly and Pittsburgh even more close-minded than your home state? I’m in Indy right now and, in my untraveled and anti-Indiana biased opinion, I’d say you’d really be asking for a beating here.
January 22, 2007 at 10:40 pm
Why have you chosen Philly or Pittsburgh for your leggings experiment?
January 22, 2007 at 11:35 pm
I don’t care for leggings on guys, but being hateful like that is rude. I love to jog in leggings even though I’m a female, and I know that most serious runners and other athletes (manly men) wear spandex in some form. But it is true that some of the designer jeans and those worn by guys like Jude Law are stinking tight, so I don’t get it.
January 22, 2007 at 11:45 pm
Just because you didn’t find anything photo worthy on your short walk through Rittenhouse, doesn’t mean we don’t understand style or taste in Philly. We’re not all cheesesteak-chomping, Rocky-loving unfashionable people. Can’t speak for Pittsburgh, though.
January 23, 2007 at 1:00 am
Hahaha! Its crazy how some people can get all worked up on a question of preference. Those guys would have had a hard time for a couple of centuries. Men, real men :) wore tights and “leggings” during the Renaissance, the Middle Ages,… even soldiers of ancient Rome had on a kind of short legging. I hope it did not ruin your fun Scott. Keep on opening peoples minds!
January 23, 2007 at 6:24 am
leggings on big muscular straight men’s legs…mmmm i like this very much. Dress proportion and of course great legs are all it takes, sober coloring is a must though if one does not want to look lile David Lee Roth or Steve Tyler…
January 23, 2007 at 8:49 am
There was an article in the Sun (a UK tabloid newspaper) where they sent a reporter out in leggings and an overcoat to see the reaction…http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j128/tomcorn/records141.jpg…there is the link.
It’s probably from a narrow minded person that has seen that article.
January 23, 2007 at 8:51 am
We have to try harder and accept the ‘weirdos’ and the ‘weirdos’ have to try harder and accept the leggings….
January 23, 2007 at 10:26 am
While I sit and pray for the women’s leggings fad to go away, along come leggings for men!!
But hey I’m not screwed up enough to send Sart any hate mail. Who are these losers anyway?
January 23, 2007 at 10:28 am
I really think people can’t have fun with fashion, this is the problem…You don’t have do adopt a style if you don’t want, but you can positivly laugh about it and keep the one you feel conf. in .
M . http://www.tintatagliopiega16.splinder.com
January 23, 2007 at 11:28 am
Lots of scared little boys in this country.
To achieve the full Cameo, you would also need the patent leather codpiece. Good luck finding one of those.
January 23, 2007 at 12:34 pm
I only mentioned Philly and Pittsburgh because they are both big cities and easy to get to from New York.
I could have said Washington DC (where one of the hate mails came from) or Boston but they are further away.
I love Philly and visit often and Willie Stargell rocks!!!!(how is that for a Pittsburgh reference!)
January 23, 2007 at 12:50 pm
Typical close minded losers, their manhood defined by their fears. I wear tights when I run, heck I wear a wetsuit when I work, kind of the same thing, right? Woud I wear them out on the street as a fashion statement? Um, not my cup of tea, I don’t even go for the tight jeans, though if you can carry it off more power to you. Fashion is what you want it to be, and what it boils down to is that you like what you’re wearing…haven’t we learned anything from “Ugly Betty”? haha
January 23, 2007 at 1:37 pm
any catalog of motorcycle apparel will include leggings – black leather, maybe suede, fringed, plain, and/or with conchos.
kind of an old-school thing for a chopper guy to wear.
January 23, 2007 at 4:51 pm
Boys in Philly already wear leggings!
January 23, 2007 at 10:08 pm
i’m not so sure about leggings with a sportcoat. however – i have no problem with men in tight pants. american football? baseball? tour de france? i love a man in some tight athletic pants…
January 25, 2007 at 9:58 pm
Better place for this experiment: Baton Rouge.
January 29, 2007 at 3:08 pm
Try antique military woolen leggings. Underwear that’s so well made that one can wear it as outerwear 60 or 70 years later! And there’s the possibility of bakelite buttons too.
February 5, 2007 at 4:09 pm
Wasn’t that Cameo’s whole look back in the 80′s?
February 11, 2010 at 8:06 pm
I was re-reading ur old posts and saw this article… omg Mr Sart u're the man