Jump to comment form
February 23, 2007 at 4:38 am
February 23, 2007 at 5:30 am
not too sure about those tights…
February 23, 2007 at 5:36 am
Love the dress and accessories – hate the fur. She poses though and that makes the photo lose a lot…I prefer your photos where the subject looks more natural.
February 23, 2007 at 5:45 am
Oh wow, she actually smile! And from the picture, she does look very slim.I love her outfit, mixing prints with fur (yet the result is not too ‘loud’), softer fabric v.s heavier fabric, the contrast is brilliant!Oh and of couse, the burgundy tights instead of the overrated Opaque Black tights.
February 23, 2007 at 6:22 am
What a chilly smile under that bob and sun glasses! Cute dress, awful fur and lovely stockings.
February 23, 2007 at 7:03 am
Fabulous as usual.
February 23, 2007 at 7:04 am
My Good!! I have never seen anybody so know-all.Anybodody can say her that her hairstyle doesn´t agree with her!!!
February 23, 2007 at 7:05 am
Ok, I really like it. The colors are amazing. BUT, personally, I have never been a fan of open toe shoes with tights.
Interesting how a Chanel-lke hairdo fits her perfectly. Could anybody picture her with another hair style on?Noooo….Eduardo – Brazil
February 23, 2007 at 7:06 am
I also intrigued about her “kisses-but-don’t-talk-to-me” face….
February 23, 2007 at 7:10 am
i’m sure i must speak for you sart in that the woman sitting next to anna makes this photo interesting. as far as what anna wintour wears? do we care? she’s so boooooring. it’s like she’s made of plaster. it doesn’t matter what she’s wearing, because she never moves and there is no life to her. the photo definately is moving though. it moved me. thank you.
February 23, 2007 at 7:14 am
Lovely as ever.
February 23, 2007 at 8:59 am
This is a fantastic pic. If I didn’t know better I’d say it was a proposed poster for the Devil Wears Prada movie. The sychophantic, slightly worried gaze of adoration by the girl on the right plus the wicked cheshire grin of Anna perfectly encapsulates the cliche about her.
February 23, 2007 at 9:16 am
un’icona,come sempre,bellissime entrambe le ragazze che la affiancano, le calze in particolare!!
February 23, 2007 at 9:45 am
WE’RE NOT WORTHY!!WE’RE NOT WORTHY!!WE’RE NOT WORTHY!!WE’RE NOT WORTHY!!
February 23, 2007 at 9:53 am
I have to know, am I the only one who thinks her hair is wrong, and that it has been all along? The rest is flawless, but the hair . . . .
February 23, 2007 at 10:05 am
I find Anna Wintour exceptionally chic despite the fact that I almost never like what she’s wearing.
I guess that’s the essence of chic…
February 23, 2007 at 10:14 am
Some people may not like her, for any reason, but I think she is great and she is doing a fantastic work at Vogue! I like her dress!
February 23, 2007 at 10:26 am
anna’s brand of fabulousness is what it is. but what I really love is how her colleague – virginia smith – is dressed. I aspire to be that effortlessly chic…I suppose being tall as a tree and having access to all of the collections helps…
February 23, 2007 at 10:40 am
She’s always looks so posh.
February 23, 2007 at 10:43 am
Why am I thinking Grey Gardens/Whatever Happened to Baby Jane gothic weirdness here…although I do love the print on the dress.
June 24, 2013 at 10:32 am
LOL, wicked but very on point!
February 23, 2007 at 11:09 am
Who is the woman next to her, she’s wonderful! I think Anna is beautiful, but I’m not a fan on the tights and shoe combo.
February 23, 2007 at 11:17 am
A lovely dress and wonderful burnt wine hoisery but what I really like here is that her lip color is not only excellently chosen for the color scheme but is age and event appropriate, and flattering for her skin tone. It is rare indeed that I see a woman these days and think “Perfect makeup”.
February 23, 2007 at 11:34 am
I love the tights with open toe shoes look. Is that a little smile I see Ms. I never smile cracking just for you Sart? Fabulous.
February 23, 2007 at 11:42 am
I love Anna, but when you compare her to Corinne. . . there is really no competition. Very different styles for sure, but Anna always seems so stiff compared to the easy chic of Corinne. I do love the cheekiness of the red tights with the bronze open-toe sandal, though — takes the pretty-pretty dress up a notch.
Also, a much overdue congratulations on the Cookie gig and, most importantly, on your darling daughters.
I read you every day — and I definitely dress more thoughtfully because of it!
February 23, 2007 at 11:49 am
The one and only! of course! elegant!
February 23, 2007 at 12:32 pm
Oh, Anna. I’ve always loved her hair. I like the look of the girl to her left. Who is she?
February 23, 2007 at 1:16 pm
February 23, 2007 at 2:11 pm
wow… yeah, wow… ever since i was a little girl i wanted to look like that.
February 23, 2007 at 3:13 pm
love the burgundy tights. opaque black ones aren’t overrated. they’re just a different choice. but someone’s got to tell wolford to go forth and conquer other colors too.
would love to see a candid or on the street photo of anna though. the pose and the look on her face ruins the spot-on outfit.
February 23, 2007 at 3:17 pm
thats not a “girl” on the right, thats virginia smith I believe. shes an editor at vogue.
February 23, 2007 at 3:28 pm
I think Anna looks beautiful here and also very young.
February 23, 2007 at 3:46 pm
Don’t we love this look!
February 23, 2007 at 3:48 pm
Yeahhh love Anna!! everyone hates her hair but i like her signature bob although the highlights look very stripy….its nice to see her wearing different colour combinations – nice dress! is that her daughter next to her?
February 23, 2007 at 3:56 pm
the rest are pretenders
February 23, 2007 at 3:58 pm
She looks quite pleased that you are taking her picture – in a “Roitfeld, you don’t win today!” sort of way.
I think the warm colors really make her stand out in a sea of grey. The dress reminds me of the yellow-flowered Prada dress that was all over the celebs about two years ago. And the hair – a signature is a signature. Her signature works very well for her – in that it is not half as comical as the hair-rolls and head art that other people have become associated with, and in that it hides her face and maintains quite a bit of her all-important inscutability.
(if this posts more than once, my apologies – it’s acting odd)
d. chedwick bryant
February 23, 2007 at 4:03 pm
but does her smile extend to her eyes? one can only hope. i noticed the shoes/tights combo right away, if SHE wears it, it MUST be OK, however i don’t see it for me.
love her hair, the dress, the fur.
February 23, 2007 at 4:19 pm
that’s Vogue’s Virginia Smith sitting next to Ms. Wintour.
Hair stylist in London
February 23, 2007 at 4:44 pm
She is the devil in Prada……love love love her!
Amazing how she has never ever changed her hairdo in a million years but she always looks fab!
February 23, 2007 at 4:59 pm
Love, love, love, Virginia’s shoes!
February 23, 2007 at 5:07 pm
I like the tunic/tights/shoes combo on the woman next to Anna.
February 23, 2007 at 5:19 pm
She always looks like she knows what she’s doing. Despite what people think of what she wears, I just don’t think she give a sh**, hehe.The woman next to her is simply gorgeous.
February 23, 2007 at 5:34 pm
To Ms Wintour’s left: isn’t that Vogue’s Virginia Smith gazing on admiringly?
February 23, 2007 at 5:36 pm
Aaaah… Once again Madame Editor in Chief, getting away with an impossible look.
February 23, 2007 at 5:54 pm
this is a fab photo, she looks amazing in what I think may be prada? she is so beautifully groomed always and the fur is great. Anna Wintor is a true inspration and consumate pro at all times and in my view is given such a hard time by the press etc!you have got a great shot here as she is she is smiling which makes her look warmer than usual!
February 23, 2007 at 7:06 pm
I think she looks terrific. However, though I love tights with open-toe shoes, these shoes are a little too strappy. Also, don’t her highlights look a little too severe?
February 23, 2007 at 8:19 pm
Her and Carine Roitfeld have pretty much the same haircut and style. Must be the Vogue influence.
February 23, 2007 at 8:29 pm
I second that about the highlights.
February 23, 2007 at 9:19 pm
I wanted to write something earlier but was too intimidated by the infamous Wintour *crawls below her feet* she didn’t see me, did she??!
February 23, 2007 at 9:54 pm
I’ve recently noticed that looks that seem like they were thrown on and put together ‘easily’ i.e. easy chic is so celebrated, yet looks that are seem put-together are considered as inferior. Why? I have no idea.
Anna Wintour knows what she’s doing and this picture is proof. We should all give her kudos for giving her gift of fashion to the general public.
February 23, 2007 at 10:22 pm
She’s an icon & I don’t like the fur, & I think that the girl sitting next to her- her style resembles Miss Wintour, from top to bottom, even better.
February 23, 2007 at 11:22 pm
I might be aware that you’ve probably only had a moment to snap her picture.. but any indication what she’s like in the flesh?
Blue Floppy Hat
February 23, 2007 at 11:26 pm
Nice shot, as always :)Lovely dress she’s got on, and she looks amazing for a woman her age, but I’m not sure I like the fur- though that could maybe be because I don’t really like fur..
February 24, 2007 at 12:28 am
Well, the only person who looks better next to Virginia Smith is her BEE-U-TEE-FULL husband Patrick Robinson. Talk about a wonderfully stylish man.
February 24, 2007 at 12:39 am
Incredibly chic, although I don’t like the shoes at all. I read an article about her once – can’t remember where – Vogue or Vanity Fair – and she swore allegiance to three makes/ styles of shoes – the only shoes she’ll ever wear. There were shots of the shoes with the article and I thought they were all awful – a little too school-marm maybe? Anyways, since then, I keep an eye out for her footwear. Unfortunately, as per this photo, she was apparently telling the truth. I think she should branch out.
Again though, the rest of the look is fabulous. She looks wonderful.
February 24, 2007 at 10:14 am
god, I guess I’m the only one who thinks her stockings and shoe combination is positively orthopedic. But she is smiling straight at YOU– she knows you, dude– and the girl next to her has all the style.
February 24, 2007 at 10:45 am
Anna Wintour must be the only woman on the planet who can combine sandals with a fur coat and still look chic and fabulous …
February 24, 2007 at 10:57 am
This photo IS real and captures a moment that otherwise might be missed. The photo works perfectly …Anna’s demure smile of a wise, certain, “if-you-don’t-like-it, f*uck-you/I-got-mine” woman of a certain age (how I love that!); and the undisguised admiration of the young woman next to her, who clearly knows that she is sitting next to THE Goddess. Anna, I love VOGUE. As a woman of a certain age also, VOGUE is the only fashion magazine I still read, and not only because of the fashion. Thank you, Anna, for being the ADULT of the Fashion world and thank you, Sart, for capturing the moment so perfectly!
stacy (la, ca)
February 24, 2007 at 11:45 am
We truly *are not* worthy!!!! :)
Great look, and the strappy-shoe-over-tights works very well. I’ve been doing the tights and open or strappy shoe thing all winter, and *I* think its a winning trend … Even the upcoming season’s “fashion forecasts” seem to extend the tights trend. Yaay!
February 24, 2007 at 11:47 am
Could she be the hottest Cougar ever?
February 24, 2007 at 12:00 pm
Very chic, of course. I can never see the woman, however, without wishing someone would cook her a good steak dinner. Virginia Smith outshines her by far.
February 24, 2007 at 12:30 pm
There is no standard that she follows. She makes her own, and her look ultimately belongs to one person: herself! That makes her a leader in style. Her singular look comes from being exposed to millions of looks every moment of every day. Jackson Pollock’s splatters may seem to be random, but there is educated intention behind them.
February 24, 2007 at 12:35 pm
This confirms it – the newest trend is to wear tights or socks with sandals! This makes me really happy as my toes are always cold.
February 24, 2007 at 1:22 pm
“Very very devilish” as Michael Jackson would say.
February 24, 2007 at 2:47 pm
I like how both women are wearing same colour tights and open shoes. I think I’ll be doing that to this spring.
February 24, 2007 at 3:08 pm
Hmm, there’s trying too hard and then there’s the (who I’ll only assume) intern’s extreme version of trying too hard with the loving look.
It all seems very “Westmount.” I guess that’s Montreal’s version of the Hampton’s to Americans.
Sorry, Sart, there’s something about this set up — but not the photographic skills, of course — that displeases me tremendously. So much so that I can’t begin to appreciate what fashion may be within…although I tried for at least a millisecond. Really.
February 24, 2007 at 4:01 pm
is she wearing Alberta Ferretti or…?
February 24, 2007 at 5:35 pm
I love Anna Wintour, She is absolutetly fab.Not even talk about Virgina Smith,one of the nicest editor of Vogue.
February 24, 2007 at 8:49 pm
Is it possible? Is she slightly smiling?! Actually, on second thought, she’s smirking. She can’t elude me forever. One day, somehow, somewhere, I will find a picture of her really smiling.
February 24, 2007 at 9:30 pm
Is there any reason whatsoever to wear sunglasses indoors?
February 25, 2007 at 4:45 am
I’ve never seen Ms Wintour look so young and effortlessly chic. She actually looks quite fluid, and dare I say, content, in this picture. I love it.
February 25, 2007 at 2:47 pm
Anna is dressed sooooo beautifully! and the girl sitting next to her is really nice as well.. However, she sits in the shadow of Anna, so she doesnt sparkle.. which is in my opinion pity, because she looks very good..
February 25, 2007 at 2:50 pm
Her dress is Carolina Herrera Fall 2007 collection.*as seen on the runway*
February 25, 2007 at 5:21 pm
David: thanks for clueing us in.
I wonder why all I could think of was that yellow flowered dress from Prada’s fall 2000 show . . . it’s odd, when looking for it, to realize how long ago that was!
February 25, 2007 at 6:31 pm
i like her daughter.
February 26, 2007 at 10:51 am
That’s the most colorful outfit I’ve ever seen her in.
February 26, 2007 at 2:20 pm
I guess I’m the only one who dislikes the dress. Too loud for my taste. The dress wears her instead of the other way around.
March 12, 2010 at 10:20 pm
I can't believe you caught a picture of her SMILING!
I almost chocked on my grape-flavored candy.
March 30, 2010 at 2:18 pm
Scott, if Anna smiled @ YOU, it means you are something. And she even posed! Great capture. Full of irony, but not hers. Yours!
January 3, 2012 at 3:00 pm
Great overall look, the red thights with the skirt, the shoes and the calender in her hands. First time I see her smile for the camera
February 13, 2012 at 9:15 pm
Not sure about this look…but her hair is always perfection. What is up with all the NY girls who don’t wear a stitch of makeup? I don’t get it…just a little blush and gloss goes a long way! Maybe they didn’t read the article in the NY Times.
Check it out..
August 21, 2012 at 9:47 am
I’ve never been a fan of wearing stockings with open shoes – I would have never thought she would wear this, not like her. Wonder if she did it on purpose or if she really likes how the combination looks. Overall, she looks good though!
March 29, 2013 at 6:56 pm
In the editor’s stakes, she’s no Diana Vreeland.
June 24, 2013 at 10:34 am
Sorry to sound doctrinaire, but the fur is so unnecessary. Faux fur would actually be more effective.