Jump to comment form
April 4, 2007 at 8:22 am
yea…this does look good. But then again…he´s kind of tall and has wide shoulders to help the overhall look.
April 4, 2007 at 8:34 am
It looks great, though I have to say it’s possible he doesn’t quite have those shoulders. An impressive fit through the waist. Here in Calgary it is much more typical to see blown out size 46 jackets that have been butchered to provide more room through the gut…
April 4, 2007 at 8:35 am
I do not agree, as I think that the shoulders are to wide and clearly do not fit correct.
I love your photos, keep up the good work as I check your blog on a daily base.
February 8, 2013 at 10:16 am
I have to agree with you here. Shoulders look fine, but the bell shape is too feminine looking and who knows what’s going on with the upper half of the pant.
April 4, 2007 at 8:49 am
Wow, this really is a perfect suit!!! Usually they look great just from the front, in stores I mean, and then you take a look from the back and all you can see is an army of safety pins and careful pleates, planted by studious shop personnel… Always such a deception when trying to find a perfect fit and being attracted a well-fitted model on a mannequin in the window….
April 4, 2007 at 9:18 am
Pinstripes meet very nicely at the center seam there. Still, I can’t help but feel a little bad for the fellow, as my hair does the exact same thing in the back…
william d. anderson
April 4, 2007 at 9:23 am
really? i am fairly new to the sartorial world, but that tightly tailored jacket makes him look more like a woman from behind…no? the shoulders…yes. the shoulder blades..yep. but that waist is a bit much. although in light of the glut of boxy suits available, i can see where you would point out a fella who went the other way. maybe some where in between? that’s just my $.02.
April 4, 2007 at 9:30 am
April 4, 2007 at 9:36 am
Man, there is just something about a pinstripe that drags me in!! Yes, very very nice.
PS: Like that he is ‘flanked’ by this season’s so-hot yellow!
April 4, 2007 at 9:45 am
ohhh yes, I am going to buy a suit like that, at the end of this month!
April 4, 2007 at 10:05 am
April 4, 2007 at 10:09 am
I didn’t say that it fit perfectly…yes, it may be a bit wide in the shoulders but he does have wide shoulders. Overall the shape looks great.
I would print a photo like this and take it with me when buying a suit as an example of the type of drop I would want on my suit jacket.
Again everything doesn’t have to be perfect to use it to your advantage.
April 4, 2007 at 10:24 am
I think it fits the shoulders really nicely. What I’m not sure about is the flared-out almost pepulumish effect of the bottom part of the jacket. It’s probably just the–whatchamacallems–venty things at the back catching wind.
Would be interesting to see a shot from the front to compare.
April 4, 2007 at 10:45 am
It would be interesting to see the cuffs on his shirt since the collar shows quite a bit. I believe the usual rule is the amount of collar and amount of cuff shown should be about the same.
I do like the fit of the coat and wish I had that narrow a waist.
April 4, 2007 at 10:49 am
Any guess on the make of the suit?
April 4, 2007 at 10:50 am
I think that there is a lack of proportion with regard to the shape at the bottom of the jacket- it should flair out more. The pant fit also looks odd- but this may just be a result of shooting him mid-stride. The smooth line through his waist though is ideal, no belt line or love handles, etc breaking up the smooth tight drape of the jacket.
April 4, 2007 at 11:22 am
OK, we’re talking about FIT, not cut; you may disagree with the cut–perhaps you’d like the shoulders to be a bit narrower– but, given it, the jacket fits the guy correctly, just as it should.
April 4, 2007 at 11:25 am
Too much waist suppression in my eyes. It comes off as effeminate.
April 4, 2007 at 12:53 pm
if you do two things to a suit,1. waist suppression2. adjust the shoulders*3. with a jacket tailored like the aforementioned, skinny pants are a perfect match!
i went to my boyfriend’s office party (on wall street) in a suit like this. among all of the other boxy, cookie-cutter suits, mine really stood out. everyone liked it, but walking around down there, i looked like i was some way-out flouncy fashionista. odd how you can be in manhattan, yet feel like you’re in the some backwater town.
April 4, 2007 at 1:12 pm
It seems a bit feminine for my taste. I don’t think men should highlight an hourglass shape.
April 4, 2007 at 1:38 pm
the waist is very nice.
April 4, 2007 at 2:09 pm
i can see what he was trying to achieve, i personally think the shoulders are slightly off as well, which makes the amount of drop seem out of proportion or feminine.
visit http://www.kilgour.eu and you should see a pic of the back of a model in a dark blue pinstripe suit, which i believe looks SUPERB and is how a suit should look from the back. i also think it’s the sort of look that this man is trying to achieve.
April 4, 2007 at 2:12 pm
This post is a good example of why I tune in to this blog. As a female who takes a liking to traditional masculine styles (not just “modern”, feminine interpretations of such details as pinstripes or shirting fabrics), you are an invaluable resource.
Ditto butch at 11:22 – Any build may use a variety of cuts, but a good fit is not negotiable.
April 4, 2007 at 3:15 pm
Perfect fit to me !Love the narrow waist, very italian meets the new Savile Row.Stripes meet indeed very nicely in the center.I would definately go for such a suit ;-)
April 4, 2007 at 3:22 pm
sart – i must ask where you shot this, i think this is my husband!
April 4, 2007 at 3:47 pm
Quite nice, but a little too nipped in at the waist. One more inch +/- of fabric would let the jacket fall perfectly.
Love your site!
April 4, 2007 at 3:50 pm
You don’t think that the fit makes his waist look, well, a little *feminine*?
The way he seams and pattern fit together is wonderful, it’s just that the tight fit through the waist with the double vents gives him a bit of an hourglass from behind. A single vent might not have, perhaps?
April 4, 2007 at 3:52 pm
Damn, you’re right. Perfect.
April 4, 2007 at 5:45 pm
I’m afraid some of the commenters who find this nipped waist on a man’s jacket ‘effeminate’ or ‘feminine’ would be shocked to see how closely cut European and English men wear their suit jackets. The tight, hourglass jacket shape is considered very traditional and very masculine everywhere except America, where menswear has taken on the character of shapeless boxes for the body. I have found it nearly impossible to persuade American tailors to shape a jacket this close to the body. So bravo to this chap and his tailor, as clearly this is an altered off-the-peg suit and not tailor-made.
November 29, 2012 at 9:22 pm
Agreed. I love this suit’s dimensions. Only in America do men seem terrified or ashamed of a suit that shapes and follows a fit body line. I’m sure they’d be equally ashamed to see the tight fitting waist and crotch from the front.
April 4, 2007 at 7:10 pm
wow now that’s an hourglass shape
April 4, 2007 at 7:36 pm
I think this is a great fit – and yes, it does give more shape (whether that’s “womanly” or not is debatable) through the waist.
That’s why I like it! Why should men be blocks? Quite a few of them have wider shoulders with nipped-in waists. It’s a body type on a man that I am quite partial to. Give me that over the rectangular man any day. Love this fit.
April 4, 2007 at 8:30 pm
A narrow waist is feminine? Really? I didn’t know – I just thought it was a nice ‘V’ shape, the kind we used to go for…
April 4, 2007 at 8:35 pm
PS: and thanks for the rear view.
April 4, 2007 at 9:05 pm
Astounding to me that many posters feel that a closely nipped jacket waist is feminine. I once had a tailor who refused to nip a jacket to my liking for this very reason. Alas, I capitulated and never really enjoyed the jacket thereafter for that reason.
The question is not nipped closely versus not, but whether the wearer looks COMFORTABLE in his jacket, no matter the waist.
April 4, 2007 at 9:56 pm
i wanna see the front!! is he cute? haha!
that’s what a good suit should do for a man…
April 4, 2007 at 10:57 pm
This is a stunning suit.
April 5, 2007 at 12:06 am
Nice cut on the suit! Nice behind on the dude. :-)
April 5, 2007 at 7:25 am
Yes, no joke; too many suits have those little ripply wrinkles across the upper back, signifying an inferior tailoring job. This is perfect.
April 5, 2007 at 8:21 am
I love this…the V shape works well for tall people but not for short ones though – except i they’re slim. Pinstripes look great too!
April 5, 2007 at 8:23 am
My Emporio Armani is nipped at the waist almost like this jacket – italians always know best!
April 5, 2007 at 9:23 am
The comment about the fit are interesting. This is obviously a young guy with big shoulders and a slim waist. The fit on the shoulders is fine, if the suit was too big the extremities of the shoulders would be slipping down his arms. They are not. The degree of waist nipping is a matter of personal taste, but surely we all want some shaping, why else do we fight the onset of the big gut. This doesn’t seem particularly excessive, just a young fit guy revelling in his physique. A couple of posters have also commented on the smoothness of the back. This again is something of a matter of taste and comfort. Many people like a little bit of fullness in the back, not the Appalachians, so they can move their arms comfortably. There doesn’t appear to much with this suit, but it’s hard to tell. Overall a great looking back.
April 5, 2007 at 9:26 am
one more vote for “too tight in the waist”.
57th & 2nd
April 5, 2007 at 9:27 am
This is the way a suit should look. Very nice Silhouette. Though his shoulder area is a tad bit baggy, however men should not fear to take in their suits. One should always wear his suit, not let his suit wear him.
April 6, 2007 at 7:25 am
I somewhat disagree – it’s not a perfect fit.
April 6, 2007 at 7:42 pm
Now that’s what I call bringing Sexyback.
April 7, 2007 at 11:28 pm
anyone else think the thighs/legs of the trousers are a bit flappy/baggy for such a closely tailored jacket?
April 14, 2007 at 10:26 pm
This suit is no doubt a very expensive and well-made one (a la Paul Stuart). However, the fit of the back is a bit to suppressed for my tastes. The jacket should not hug the entire upper body and torso so much. It makes the wearer look like the jacket has a built-in corset.
April 21, 2009 at 10:36 pm
I thought you only saw such an exaggerated look in drawings. Yes, the suit fits the contours of the body. When a man has such prominent hips, however, he would do well to engage in a little sartorial trickery.
September 2, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Have your finger touch the spot where the butt and thigh meet. Then add one or one half more inche(s) to make it look balanced. I have over 1500 suits and I have it done this way. I am 5'9" and 46R. 31.5 is the minimal and 32 is the max. Anything below or above that is not going to look balanced on me. It took me 5 years to do it right.
September 23, 2009 at 3:57 am
Who put together this sand bag ensemble. Do any of you see a European tailor once a month. This was probably bought at mens wearhouse. Seriously
January 23, 2012 at 12:29 pm
Scott you have an excellent eye. It is like an engineering.
February 24, 2012 at 4:06 pm
YSL is bold and eiixtcng. I’d instantly love Kors’ tan coloured suit. I was expecting some armani tho! :)I have a couple and they are just great. what can I say. :p
April 24, 2012 at 11:27 am
Tight in the waist – looks feminine??? What’s wrong with you people!!! Without seeing the front it appears to be a fairly perfect fit. Yes, np, this is what many of us are working hard at the gym to achieve – the male v-shaped torso. “Women, on average, tend to be more attracted to men who have a relatively narrow waist, a V-shaped torso, and broad shoulders…” I’ll stop now, no need to rant on about other people’s opinions…
April 24, 2012 at 11:29 am
He might want to consider closing the vents. I have done that on most of my suit and sport coats. It gives a more youthful, European look. And while you’re young and trim enough to do it, why not? Thanks.
August 13, 2012 at 7:40 am
can’t agree with the perfect fit tag. Too loose under the arms. Also a suit has two parts and the cut of the trousers is all wrong.
March 27, 2013 at 3:35 pm
Great fit in the jacket, even though I would go for a slightly shorter model. But whats with the baggies?