taylor tomasi is the bestest !! shes soo nice and tres chic

Concentrating on the clothing details, that is one interesting high waisted skirt, the bag is a nice size and the shoes are to die for. I have neve been a fan of that type of tank shirt, but I hear New York is enjoying a lovely late summer after a season of wacky weather, so more power to her.

Wow! There really isn’t much else to say, except… I hope this heavenly creature didn’t cause too many accidents today while walking the streets of planet earth.

gorgeous woman, she does not look as young or skinny as a model.

Her style is very well measured, not a flaunter: that is for me the sine qua non of elegance.

although i do like the outfit, (the shoes in particular) i think she could have chosen a better top

John (L.A.- Los Feliz)

First, let’s say the obvious — she’s gorgeous, isn’t she? The hair and the smile, lovely. She could wear trashbags and no one would get past the eyes, right?

Ok, now the clothes.

I love the wrap on the shoes. I think there’s something innately sexy about the whole light-bondage aspect of tied shoes or sandals. That being said — they’re too high, too elevated and the foam too thick for my puritan tastes. Imagine them down a wee bit closer to the ground and the heel less, I dunno, pointed. Circa 1945, perhaps, or 1975. Same bit of kink, with a wee bit more elegance.

She has an excellent figure, and she’s showing it. Good for her! No empire waistline maternity wear here. For the record ladies, my 70 yr old mother calls those cupie dresses “maternity wear,” for the simple reason that in 1972, that’s what you wore when you were shapless and preggers. Get the picture? Even if you’re roomy, love your shape. ESPECIALLY if you’re roomy, love your shape. Drape your shape. Don’t wear 60′s/70′s materinity dresses, please. Don’t blob out on us.

Back to our lovely girl on the street. Something up top, beneath the smile and killer hair is missing. The purse is great — echoes the shoes. And I love the dress but the top — even though it provides some welcome contrast — seems almost too plain. The shoes hit a historical note, summery, followed by a button dress… and the top fails to deliver.

Still, can *anyone* say she isn’t gorgeous? I think not. Long legs, red hair, and a broad smile. An elegant, staueque head turner, for sure!

Gasp,…

oh-my-god! this could perhaps be the perfect outfit. that skirt and those shoes! wherever did she get such masterpieces?

Amazing legs & shoes !

she’s really hot.

I like the skirt.. and whoa Sart, is that an advertisement on your page?? ;)

W O W

i know i’m supposed to be looking at high waisted skirt etc but her pure kim basinger sexiness makes it kind of irrelevant.

bomb-shell. Love her.

not over done for fashion week. not trying to hard. she’s hot, she knows it, but she’s refined.

She is pretty and I I like the skirt and the top-sexy enough.The shoes look bothering large and the bag is anonymous,otherwise well done.

Yowza! I’m so envious of women who can walk in heels like this. I would topple instantly!

Is TT engaged?? What’s up with the ring?

Wow, I could almost cry I want to be her so much. Stunning. Sigh.

Absolutely gorgeous.
Sexy without vulgarity.

Love for sale? The shoes are almost self-parodying: sort of Minnie Mouse goes Kraft-Ebbing.

Perhaps more to the point, they bring the eye down, down, down while “shortening” the legs above.
And their weightiness is in unflattering contrast to the airiness of the rest.

OK. I’ll stop now.

Sexy!

Where can I get a pair of those heels?! Does anybody know? She looks exactly like the woman I want to be, and am in my secret mind. Cool, elegant, effortless, intelligent, laid back, chic, sophisticated, doesn’t take herself too seriously, fun, understated, etc…. *WOW*
make that *Whoawhoawewa!*

Taylor – if you read this and ever come to London, please may I fall in love with you…?

is anyone else against this outfit?
obviously she’s beautiful and it works, but I think the high waisted short skirt makes her torso look short and legs freakishly long, (maybe that was the point?)

Also, not a fan of the shoes in this getup, think the shirt/skirt combo deserves something simpler the shoes seem overcomplicated in comparison to the simplicity of the rest of the outfit.

shame she’s married…

This woman is really, really attractive, but when I step back and look at the outfit as a whole for some reason I don’t like it. I don’t think it’s optimally flattering for her. The top with the black bra underneath I think is what is bothering me the most–it makes her look unbalanced. I also think that given the choice of top a more delicate shoe would move the outfit further in the direction of classy. I could see this woman looking stunning in a ladylike dress and delicate heels; Ulla’s outfit a few weeks back was a good example of that kind of dressing.

i love her shoes especially the heels.

ok, i am so loving the redheads this month. . . but i’ve always crushed on the reds.

This woman has the kind of natural radiance, glowy beauty, and, well, height that makes us short women feel like schlumps no matter how nice we try to look. I am jealous of those great gams! Great skirt to show them off!

WOW!

Honestly though, this picture is not even about the clothes. With a body, hair, face and a smile like hers, she could wear a brown bag… or a birthday suit, and she would look marvelous. Which kind of begs the question. What is this blog about?!!?

ahh! the black bra! and the short waist too. these things make the look less than amazing for me. but it doesn’t really matter that much cos clearly she is hot-hot-hot.

Where can I get those shoes???? I need them!

are those balenciaga shoes? i really fell in love with those… but personally i think she is way hotter in them than i would have been.

There is no question: the shirt is frumpy and is not flattering for her physique. She gave up there, when the shoes and skirt demanded so much more! I love this blog, but it does annoy me when the posts focus on the”wowza” subject/object rather than the clothes or the wearer’s panache in pulling off a look.

Anyway, there have been much better ensembles on these pages, her obvious attractiveness notwithstanding.

Simple. Sexy. Well done!

p.s. FABULOUS Shoes!

the skirt is interesting (in a good way), but would probably be a very unfortunate choice for those of us with anything more than a washboard stomach. and i dont think those shoes would do any favors for women who aren’t long and lean, as she is. but imagine this outfit with a normal mini-skirt. she’d look like a -ahem- workin woman (with expensive accesories), especially if she weren’t such a fresh-faced, earthy beauty. i mean put it together: see-thru tank with contrasting bra, mini-skirt cut-up-to-there, stacked, strappy platform heels. in any other permutation, it would spell utter disaster (or desperation!).

i’m certain this woman is painfully fashionable, so everything is intentional, even the peek-a-boo bra (kinda wish she hadn’t). she could probably stand for a little more “support,” especially when wrangling with the dimensions of the high waist.

but she does achieve a mystifying balance between tartiness and earthiness, and her creativity must be applauded. oh, and i covet her bangles.

Curious to know how tall she is. (I’m 6 feet tall myself, and wonder if somebody as tall as I could do those shoes …)

Wow! Simplistically elegant and very sexy! However, the bra cheapens her outfit, she needs to wear a nude one.

even though this is rather late…. i feel like i need to say something about ‘anonymous’ john from l.a.’s post.

i couldn’t help but be a little annoyed by his description of clothing with empire waists as ‘maternity wear.’ of course, they are comfortable and flattering for many pregnant or recently pregnant women. nothing is better than building confidence when your body goes through rapid & intense changes. but here are my two main problems:
1. just because your mother says it, doesn’t ever make it the ultimate truth. even if that’s what they were called in 1972, we are now 30 years in the future. get over the fact that NOTHING in fashion is brand new. if you follow this blog, how can you not realize that it’s all about reinterpretation?
2. i’m rather disturbed that you encourage women who are ‘roomy’ to flaunt their shape directly after you’ve called pregnant women ‘shapeless.’ [which you spelled 'shapless,' by the way.]
one of the more recent and perhaps best trends in fashion is the acceptance of maternity wear as a legitimate market.
in my opinion, that also means that pregnancy is not just accepted as something that will happen, but that a woman’s body at that time is different than it will ever be again, and why shouldn’t she want to look just as attractive?

lastly?
unless you crossdress [which is a fabulous expression of being a woman], i always find it hard to accept a man outside of the fashion industry feeling the need to socially construct a woman’s image.

The shoes looks gorgeous which perfectly fit the mini skirt.She looks fabulous.

Shoes too high, she didn’t need more height. I hope she wasn’t going to work in corporate america dressed like that?

i really dont know if I like this look – she’s got the perfect body for it and they are classic pieces but somehow it looks a little tacky…is it the shoes?? not sure…

Red heads are a dying breed, it’s a pity.
I love everything thing here but the tank top, it looks like a chesty bonds reserved for excruciatingly hot days, the beach, home and young kids…sorry.

That’s what I call elegance.

skirt is Marc Jacobs.

MY GOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!

Haha! your right “Bluespana”